Editing Christianity and Zoosexuality (section)

==Genesis==

===Genesis 2:23===
For a better understanding of this very foreign and very controversial concept in Christianity, let's examine the position Judaism takes towards Genesis 2:23. The following is taken from the Jewish Bible with Rashi's commentary.


{{Blockquote|text=And man said, "This time, it is bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh. This one shall be called Isiah (woman) because this one was taken from ish (man).|title=''Genesis 2:23''}}


{{blockquote|text=This teaches us that Adam came to all the animals and the beasts'' ''[in search of a [[mate]]], but he was not satisfied until he found Eve.||author=''Rashi''|title=''Commentary for Gen 2:23''|source=''from Yev. 63A''}}

Rashi further references from the Jewish Talmud, Yebamoth 63a:

{{blockquote|text=Yebamoth 63a states “What is meant by the Scriptural text, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh? This teaches that Adam had intercourse with every beast and animal but found no satisfaction until he cohabited with Eve.|source=''ibid''}}

So there, we have something quite significant for [[zoophiles]]. The Jewish faith and interpretation clearly show that the LORD brought Adam to have sexual relations with all the beasts of the field but was not satisfied until he eve was made. I’m sure this is shocking to some of you listening, but please, the Jewish rabbis are very shrewd in their interpretations, and why did they choose this very uncommon commentary? There must be a biblical reason why they interpreted Genesis 2:23 that way, and there is. Now grab your King James Bible, and let us look at why the rabbi interpreted Adam's [[bestiality]] as so. Let's read Genesis 2:18-20

===Genesis 2:18-20===
{{blockquote|text=And the LORD God said, It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him an help meet for him. And out of the ground the LORD God formed every beast of the field, and every fowl of the air; and brought them unto Adam to see what he would call them: and whatsoever Adam called every living creature, that was the name thereof. And Adam gave names to all cattle, and to the fowl of the air, and to every beast of the field; but for Adam there was not found an help meet for him.|title=''Genesis 2:18-20''}}

The Jewish words for help meet are ''Ezer Kenegdo'', which literally means "A Help corresponding to him". That is established correctly? The LORD brought all the beasts before Adam to find Help corresponding to him. The MEAT of the question is what kind of help was the LORD looking for Adam? I’ll emphasize this again, what kind of ''EZER KENEGDO'' did the LORD intend?

===Genesis 2:24===
{{blockquote|text=Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh.|title=''Genesis 2:24''}}

Now this verse above, clearly could not have been Adam’s words, as we know that Adam had no physical father nor mother. Who penned these words with interpretation? Obviously Moses who wrote genesis and what was the purpose that was declared for eve being made? He says it right there, “They shall be one flesh”. 

So Moses admits in genesis 2:24 that the help meet (the Ezer kenegdo) of genesis
2:18-20 was the search for a physical sexual compatibility. The LORD brought Adam the beasts of the field to become one flesh with or said more clearly.