Editing Social Aspects & Zoophilia (section)

== Aren't zoophiles sick weirdos? ==

No! Zoosexuals (= zoophiles) come from ALL strata of the population. Bus drivers, academics, car mechanics or medical assistants can have this tendency. They are completely normal, productive people who do not attract attention in everyday life.

<br />
Discriminating sexual contact between a person and an animal - as opposed to sexual contact between people - as &quot;disorder&quot;, &quot;abnormal&quot;, &quot;unhealthy&quot; etc. is nothing more than a DEFINITION. Every single aspect from which this is devalued in relation to sex between people also occurs there, but WITHOUT necessarily leading to a corresponding devaluation: e.g. sex between homosexual people cannot lead to procreation either, but from today's point of view it is still no longer perverse ; Even sex between people who come from different cultures and speak different languages â€‹â€‹cannot (as a rule) lead to a more far-reaching relationship in the human sense, but is still not perverse;

The assumption, which is by no means empirically proven to this day, that a zoophilic tendency has &quot;early childhood&quot; (traumatic!) Causes and can and should be dealt with through psychoanalysis, contains precisely this unjustified negative evaluation: because no one comparatively comes up with the idea of â€‹â€‹&quot;normal&quot; &quot;Seeing human heterosexuality as a result of early childhood trauma and wanting to deal with it through psychoanalysis. The devaluation is already implicit in the psychoanalytic question.

<br />


<div class="editsection" style="float:right;margin-left:5px;">

[ [https://web.archive.org/web/20070113165626/http://zoowiki.zetapin.de/index.php?title=Pro_und_Kontra&action=edit&section=16 edit] ]

</div>