Editing Christianity and Zoosexuality (section)

===Genesis 2:23===
For a better understanding of this very foreign and very controversial concept in Christianity, let's examine the position Judaism takes towards Genesis 2:23. The following is taken from the Jewish Bible with Rashi's commentary.


{{Blockquote|text=And man said, "This time, it is bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh. This one shall be called Isiah (woman) because this one was taken from ish (man).|title=''Genesis 2:23''}}


{{blockquote|text=This teaches us that Adam came to all the animals and the beasts'' ''[in search of a [[mate]]], but he was not satisfied until he found Eve.||author=''Rashi''|title=''Commentary for Gen 2:23''|source=''from Yev. 63A''}}

Rashi further references from the Jewish Talmud, Yebamoth 63a:

{{blockquote|text=Yebamoth 63a states “What is meant by the Scriptural text, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh? This teaches that Adam had intercourse with every beast and animal but found no satisfaction until he cohabited with Eve.|source=''ibid''}}

So there, we have something quite significant for [[zoophiles]]. The Jewish faith and interpretation clearly show that the LORD brought Adam to have sexual relations with all the beasts of the field but was not satisfied until he eve was made. I’m sure this is shocking to some of you listening, but please, the Jewish rabbis are very shrewd in their interpretations, and why did they choose this very uncommon commentary? There must be a biblical reason why they interpreted Genesis 2:23 that way, and there is. Now grab your King James Bible, and let us look at why the rabbi interpreted Adam's [[bestiality]] as so. Let's read Genesis 2:18-20