Editing
Zoosexuality
(section)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Emotions in Men=== In 1962, in his work, Masters questioned the extent to which human individuals participating in an act of bestiality regarded the animal that was their sexual partner as a person. He replied as follows: "The human expects the animal to derive satisfaction from relations with him, as it would for another person, and he is disappointed if this reaction does not occur", attribute to him emotional capacities and some conceptual skills, and "in short, he considers them a personality, a consciousness similar to human, which differs from him more erotically than spiritually. This is part of why individuals are able to 'fall in love' with animals, especially those with whom they have had repeated sexual experiences .... " Wondering in the same work if it was possible for a human being to be in love, in the romantic sense of the term with an animal and if it was possible, with the limitations linked to its nature, that an animal could have a mutual affection, he commented: "In this area, the attitudes and emotions with which the subjects (human) in approaching their object (animal) are considered decisive ..." We can say that there is "a real feeling for the animal on the part of the human ", and can approach what is called 'erotic love' where only humans are involved ... Although relatively rare, there are cases ... where the human being actually falls 'in love' with animals, a love including sexual relations, but also romantic elements like tenderness, spiritual affection, and even jealousy. " Likewise, Beetz states: "The emotional side does play a role for some people who have sexual contact with animals, this fact being recognized by several sources, eg Bornemann (1990), Cerrone (1991), Davis (1954), Donofrio (1996), Hentig (1962), Kinsey et al. (1948), and Miletski (1999) For example, Hentig (1962) mentions a patient described by Hirschfeld: The man was deeply in love with a [[horse]], had built a luxurious stable especially for him, pampered him, was in his own words loyal to his horse and would probably end his life if the latter died before him. A novelty - at least in his time - was the prospect of Ullerstam (1966) who suggested that both emotions and erotic feelings can be reciprocal between man and animal. Kinsey (1954) also expressed the opinion that sexual contact can lead to a very strong emotional attachment to the animal and that in some cases the animal becomes accustomed to this kind of interspecific contact to such an extent. that he neglects possible sexual partners of his own kind. "(Beetz section 5.2.11) Williams and Weinberg (2003) found that "almost all [the [[zoophiles]] in their study] claimed to be in love with an animal partner and to have perceived that their animal partner was in love with them." Finally, according to Kurrelgyre (1995, cited by Miletski) "Many zoos find satisfaction simply by giving pleasure to their animal."
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Zoophilia wiki are considered to be released under the GNU Free Documentation License 1.3 or later (see
Project:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
associated-pages
Page
Discussion
English
Views
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Page information