Editing Zoosexuality (section)

==Emotions in Animals==
There have been fewer studies of animal responses to the zoosexual activity. Masters, in 1962, wrote:

"Where Sadism and Sadomasochism are not present, there is a lot of room for doubt as to whether there is cruelty. In fact, ancient historians like Kinsey in our time have always noted that animals tend to be emotionally attached (not just physically) to humans who have sex with them, and sometimes even forego sex with their own species, indicating their preference for dealing with humans. bestiality, it doesn't sound like it's an act of cruelty as far as the animal is concerned. "
Masters ultimately speculated that:

"One seems forced to conclude, the animal withdraws therefrom, whether it is psychically [16] that emotionally - where both - pleasure in having sexual contacts with a being of a higher intellectual, emotional and nervous organization, who is in a way able to offer the animal non-material rewards that another animal is not able to offer. "
Drawing inspiration from Masters, [[Alfred Kinsey]] "accepts as a fact that animals can develop a great deal of affection for humans who have sex with them."

Miletski (1999) information on sexual practice with animals on the internet is often very emphatic on how to give pleasure and interpret consent , and how to avoid injury, to the point that she concluded that "we can find instructions on how to know that the animal is okay with sex, as well as suggestions, such as cutting their fingernails before engaging in any sexual act with an animal, so as not to physically harm the animal. "

Beetz adds to these findings that in acts other than "sexual violence", sexual contact "of appropriate anatomy and size" does not necessarily cause pain or injury to the animal.

Observing the capacity of animals to have genuine emotions, Jonathan Balcombe argues in his book (2006) that animals have a greatly developed sense of pleasure in life, and not just elementary responses like pain [18] referring to this book, Wayne Pacelle , President and CEO of the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) comments: “Dr. Balcombe argues with conviction that animals are individual beings with a wide range of emotions and feelings. and I think it does - it follows that we have to debate the ethical consequences from his important point of view. "