Editing Zoosexuality (section)

==References==
https://www.animalzoofrance.com/wiki/Zoosexualit%C3%A9
 Miletsky, chapter 13
 Miletsky, chapter 13
 UK Home Office "Review of sexual offenses" 2002
 "the sexual perversion of dull, insensitive, and unfastidious persons. It flourishes among primitive peoples and among peasants. It is the vice of the clodhopper, unattractive to women ...", Havelock Ellis, Studies in the psychology of sex, 1927
 Quoted by Miletsky, 1999, p.65.
 Beetz (2002) section 5.2.25: "One of the most monumental and recent studies on human-animal sexual contact was conducted by Miletski in 1999"
 Review by Vern Bullough Emeritus Professor at SUNY, Professor at California State University, Past President of the Society for the Scientific Study of Sex, and Alfred Kinsey Award Winner for Outstanding Sexuality Research) published in Journal of Sex Research, May 2003: "In sum, this study is a path-breaking one and gives us a better understanding of the topic. Much work still needs to be done, but Miletski should be complimented for her pioneering efforts ..." ( Online version )
 "The findings of this question ... clearly indicate that different people have different levels of sexual inclination toward animals." Is there a sexual orientation toward nonhuman animals? "- yes, so it appears ... it very clearly shows that some people ... have feelings of love and affection for their animals, have sexual fantasies about them, and admit they are sexually attracted to them. Sexual orientation, as we know it, can be fluid and changing with time and circumstances ... We can place people on all levels of the Kinsey scale, even when we apply this scale to sexual orientation toward animals. It is logical to assume that the majority of the human race will be placed around the zero point of this Kinsey-like scale ... but the current study shows that there are some humans whose place on this Kinsey-like scale is definitely not zero . In fact, there are some ... individuals whose place on this scale would be the other extreme (6 = sexual inclination exclusively with animals). "(Miletski ch.13 pp.171-172)
 "Findings of this study agree with the view of recent authors ... that indeed a sexual orientation towards animals - a zoosexuality - exists, even if it is not appropriate to regard all persons who have sex with animals as zoosexuals." (Beetz 2002, section 5.7)
 Journal of the International Society for Anthrozoology, published by Dr Anthony Podberscek of the University of Cambridge Department of Veterinary Medicine in Great Britain , exact citation to be obtained
 Dittert, Seidl and Soyka, Zoophilia between pathology and normality , Klinik und Poliklinik fur Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Klinikum der Universitat Munchen University of Munich, Germany. Indexed PubMed 15197450 [1]
 "Zoophilia, a sexual preference for animals, has lost its character as a severe mental disorder. In clinical practice it is rarely seen nowadays, particularly since it was decriminalized [in Germany] in 1970 ... Findings from this study do not offer explanations about the causes of zoophilia. It is noteworthy, however, that the subjects in question were socially well adapted and displayed good interpersonal social skills. "
 Beetz 2002, section 5.2.4. "Not clearly named in this list is the form of zoophilia, that is characterized by an emotional as well as a sexual attraction respectively love to an animal, which is called zoosexuality by other authors (Donofrio, 1996; Miletski, 1999). attraction is experienced and not deliberately chosen, and the animal does not serve as a surrogate in such a relation. "
 quoted by Miletsky, p. 41
 Miletsky, chapter 8
 The term psychical is used, meaning, "of the psyche ". Not to be confused with "physical, meaning," of the body ".
 Beetz 2002 section 5.2.6: "Except of the violent sexual acts with animals described above, it should be noted, that in many cases the sexual contact with a mammal of suitable anatomy and size does not necessarily cause pain or injuries to the animal . "
 Jonathan Balcombe, Pleasurable Kingdom , 2006: Publishers description states that the book: "suggests that creatures from birds to baboons feel good thanks to play, sex, touch, food, anticipation, comfort, aesthetics, and more. Combining rigorous evidence, elegant argument and amusing anecdotes, leading animal behavior researcher Jonathan Balcombe proposes that the possibility of positive feelings in creatures other than humans has important ethical ramifications for both science and society. "
[[Category:Research]]