Social Aspects & Zoophilia - Revision history

Bloit: Undo revision 135702 by CTCA (talk)

2026-04-01T08:15:45Z

Undo revision 135702 by CTCA (talk)

Show changes

CTCA at 20:46, 31 March 2026

2026-03-31T20:46:21Z

Show changes

Bloit at 23:08, 29 March 2026

2026-03-29T23:08:03Z

Show changes

F-zeroARYAN at 18:14, 26 March 2026

2026-03-26T18:14:07Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:14, 26 March 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~Allah is faggot~~		ISLAM WON! KILL PEDOS KILL ZOOPHILES! ISLAM WON![[File:Dnb chad 'pril.png]][[File:Dnb chad.jpg]][[file:DEAD NIGGER.jpg]][[File:Dnb chad 'pril.png]][[File:Dnb chad.jpg]][[file:DEAD NIGGER.jpg]][[File:Dnb chad 'pril.png]][[File:Dnb chad.jpg]][[file:DEAD NIGGER.jpg]][[File:Dnb chad 'pril.png]][[File:Dnb chad.jpg]][[file:DEAD NIGGER.jpg]]
	~~Muhammed is pedophile~~
	~~Churkis is fags~~

Jewson 1448: Replaced content with "Allah is faggot Muhammed is pedophile Churkis is fags"

2026-03-26T18:11:07Z

Replaced content with "Allah is faggot Muhammed is pedophile Churkis is fags"

Show changes

ZooWiki at 04:01, 2 December 2023

2023-12-02T04:01:51Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:01, 2 December 2023
Line 421:		Line 421:
	[[Category:Sexuality]]		[[Category:Sexuality]]
	[[Category:Resources]]		[[Category:Resources]]
	[[Category:Culture]]		[[Category:Culture]]{{Home}}

ZooWiki at 00:28, 27 November 2023

2023-11-27T00:28:34Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:28, 27 November 2023
Line 90:		Line 90:
	== An animal obeys blindly. ==		== An animal obeys blindly. ==

	Obedience must also be trained in an animal, unfortunately this is often done with violence to intimidate the animal. Under the same conditions, a person also becomes an intimidated and ostensibly ~~willless~~ being, since he then also does not dare to contradict himself and carry out the commands of the others in order to avoid punishment. On the other hand, an animal that has not had any negative experiences with the people around it will also trust them completely in most cases.		Obedience must also be trained in an animal, unfortunately this is often done with violence to intimidate the animal. Under the same conditions, a person also becomes an intimidated and ostensibly wiliness being, since he then also does not dare to contradict himself and carry out the commands of the others in order to avoid punishment. On the other hand, an animal that has not had any negative experiences with the people around it will also trust them completely in most cases.

	<br />		<br />
Line 207:		Line 207:

	<br />		<br />


	<div class="editsection" style="float:right;margin-left:5px;">		<div class="editsection" style="float:right;margin-left:5px;">

Line 229:		Line 227:
	== Animals feel differently than humans. ==		== Animals feel differently than humans. ==

	People don't feel exactly the same either. Every transfer of one's own feelings to another person is only a projection of one's own perceptions. In the same way, no one can say 100 percent what an animal feels. He will only ever be able to deduce this from its behavior, which, if you know the animal well, usually works very well.		People don't feel exactly the same either. Every transfer of one's own feelings to another person is only a projection of one's own perceptions. In the same way, no one can say 100 percent what an animal feels. He will only ever be able to deduce this from its behavior, which, if you know the animal well, usually works very well.<div class="editsection" style="float:right;margin-left:5px;">

	~~<br />~~


	<div class="editsection" style="float:right;margin-left:5px;">

	[ [https://web.archive.org/web/20070113165626/http://zoowiki.zetapin.de/index.php?title=Pro_und_Kontra&action=edit&section=21 edit] ]		[ [https://web.archive.org/web/20070113165626/http://zoowiki.zetapin.de/index.php?title=Pro_und_Kontra&action=edit&section=21 edit] ]
Line 344:		Line 337:
	Oral practices take place in many animals in such a way that the partner's erogenous zones are licked before sexual intercourse. Josef Massen was able to observe several times how young mares who knocked off the stallion despite tall horses immediately gave up their resistance after the stallion had nibbled her udder with his lips.		Oral practices take place in many animals in such a way that the partner's erogenous zones are licked before sexual intercourse. Josef Massen was able to observe several times how young mares who knocked off the stallion despite tall horses immediately gave up their resistance after the stallion had nibbled her udder with his lips.

	Homosexual behavior is very common in the animal kingdom, especially stallions, bulls, [https://web.archive.org/web/20070113165626/http://zoowiki.zetapin.de/index.php?title=Hund dogs] , rabbits, and especially [https://web.archive.org/web/20070113165626/http://zoowiki.zetapin.de/index.php?title=Ziege&action=edit goats] and [https://web.archive.org/web/20070113165626/http://zoowiki.zetapin.de/index.php?title=Schaf&action=edit sheep] . ~~Interspecific~~ animal contacts also take place, which are demonstrably not just simple errors. And these are not just rare individual cases, but such cases occur all the time ... just nobody talks about it, the topic is a big taboo in the modern Catholic religion.		Homosexual behavior is very common in the animal kingdom, especially stallions, bulls, [https://web.archive.org/web/20070113165626/http://zoowiki.zetapin.de/index.php?title=Hund dogs] , rabbits, and especially [https://web.archive.org/web/20070113165626/http://zoowiki.zetapin.de/index.php?title=Ziege&action=edit goats] and [https://web.archive.org/web/20070113165626/http://zoowiki.zetapin.de/index.php?title=Schaf&action=edit sheep] . Inter-specific animal contacts also take place, which are demonstrably not just simple errors. And these are not just rare individual cases, but such cases occur all the time ... just nobody talks about it, the topic is a big taboo in the modern Catholic religion.

	In any case, it is not true that animals only have sex for reproduction.		In any case, it is not true that animals only have sex for reproduction.
Line 362:		Line 355:
	Question: "Why do dogs lick their tails? [Note: penis ]"		Question: "Why do dogs lick their tails? [Note: penis ]"
	Answer: "Because they can."</pre>		Answer: "Because they can."</pre>
	<div class="editsection" style="float:right;margin-left:5px;">		== Dogs lick their anus!. ==

			This is a usual statement said for ages. While it is true dogs can lick their anus, this doesn't mean it's every dog in the world. This can be related to many things as to why. Most pet owners, even zoos usually do not have the issue of their dogs randomly licking themselves such as their butt. What's important, is finding out why they're dog is doing this. This can be diet, worms, or any other reason. This is why it's important to make sure you're dog is healthy and feeding a good diet. <div class="editsection" style="float:right;margin-left:5px;">

	[ [https://web.archive.org/web/20070113165626/http://zoowiki.zetapin.de/index.php?title=Pro_und_Kontra&action=edit&section=30 edit] ]		[ [https://web.archive.org/web/20070113165626/http://zoowiki.zetapin.de/index.php?title=Pro_und_Kontra&action=edit&section=30 edit] ]
Line 370:		Line 365:

	Yes, many like animals. It is all the more peculiar, however, that almost all of their animals deny their animals any sexuality. Bitches are sterilized or given medication to suppress their [[heat]]. Males are stuffed full of drive-suppressing tablets, or they are completely emasculated. And why the whole thing? Because it doesn't fit the picture of the cute little cuddly toy when Fifi suddenly clings to his owner's leg or Asta puts her tail to one side when you stroke her back. Animals have to be kind and innocent! Most people don't want to have anything to do with the fact that they, too, are drive-controlled beings with sexual needs!		Yes, many like animals. It is all the more peculiar, however, that almost all of their animals deny their animals any sexuality. Bitches are sterilized or given medication to suppress their [[heat]]. Males are stuffed full of drive-suppressing tablets, or they are completely emasculated. And why the whole thing? Because it doesn't fit the picture of the cute little cuddly toy when Fifi suddenly clings to his owner's leg or Asta puts her tail to one side when you stroke her back. Animals have to be kind and innocent! Most people don't want to have anything to do with the fact that they, too, are drive-controlled beings with sexual needs!

	~~<br />~~


	<div class="editsection" style="float:right;margin-left:5px;">		<div class="editsection" style="float:right;margin-left:5px;">
Line 392:		Line 384:
	== You shouldn't let an animal lick you off. ==		== You shouldn't let an animal lick you off. ==

	There are many reasons why people shouldn't be licked off: "It's disgusting", "It's unhealthy" and so on. But why that should be so no one can answer. The fact that, for example, the saliva of dogs has a germicidal effect, ~~or that~~ the change in disease transmission from animals to humans is far less than the probability of disease transmission between two people is simply ignored or even suppressed. That it can be licked off and the saliva of the animals is simply "BÃ¤Ã¤Ã¤h" is something that is taught from an early age. Only the exaggerated cult of hygiene in our society seems to be the only explanation for this.		There are many reasons why people shouldn't be licked off: "It's disgusting", "It's unhealthy" and so on. But why that should be so, no one can answer. The fact that, for example, the saliva of dogs has a germicidal effect, the change in disease transmission from animals to humans is far less than the probability of disease transmission between two people is simply ignored or even suppressed. Quoting "That it can be licked off and the saliva of the animals is simply "BÃ¤Ã¤Ã¤h"" is something that is taught from an early age. Only the exaggerated cult of hygiene in our society seems to be the only explanation for this.

	Since this is apparently a very emotional topic, here are a few more considerations.		Since this is apparently a very emotional topic, here are a few more considerations.
Line 429:		Line 421:
	[[Category:Sexuality]]		[[Category:Sexuality]]
	[[Category:Resources]]		[[Category:Resources]]
			[[Category:Culture]]

ZooWiki at 23:32, 26 November 2023

2023-11-26T23:32:41Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:32, 26 November 2023
Line 81:		Line 81:
	== An animal has no will of its own. ==		== An animal has no will of its own. ==

	An animal also has a will. However, this is not the same for all species and races. In the case of domestic animals, this is mostly disregarded or suppressed (which almost brought the European bison to extinction because it could not be domesticated like the primitive), since the same often only serve as a product supplier for food and goods, or are misused as presentation objects. Or as guard and service dogs often unable to lead their species-appropriate life. Don't forget the [https://web.archive.org/web/20070113165626/http://zoowiki.zetapin.de/index.php?title=Hund dogs] too[https://web.archive.org/web/20070113165626/http://zoowiki.zetapin.de/index.php?title=Hund ]which are kept as pure prestige objects. Many dog â€‹â€‹breeds have already gone through this phase (Lassie, Boomer, ...). The consequences are almost unmanageable, diseases such as hip dylapsia (HD) are only part of it, and all of this just to meet the ideal of humans. It is now also to be expected that the animal shelters will fill up again because the Disney film 101 Dalmatians once again raised this breed to prestige. One only wants to hope that it will not be so and that the need will be provided in breeding factories under inhumane conditions.		An animal also has a will. However, this is not the same for all species and races. In the case of domestic animals, this is mostly disregarded or suppressed (which almost brought the European bison to extinction because it could not be domesticated like the primitive), since the same often only serve as a product supplier for food and goods, or are misused as presentation objects. Or as guard and service dogs often unable to lead their species-appropriate life. Don't forget the [https://web.archive.org/web/20070113165626/http://zoowiki.zetapin.de/index.php?title=Hund dogs] too[https://web.archive.org/web/20070113165626/http://zoowiki.zetapin.de/index.php?title=Hund]which are kept as pure prestige objects. Many dog â€‹â€‹breeds have already gone through this phase (Lassie, Boomer, ...). The consequences are almost unmanageable, diseases such as hip dylapsia (HD) are only part of it, and all of this just to meet the ideal of humans. It is now also to be expected that the animal shelters will fill up again because the Disney film 101 Dalmatians once again raised this breed to prestige. One only wants to hope that it will not be so and that the need will be provided in breeding factories under inhumane conditions.

	<div class="editsection" style="float:right;margin-left:5px;">		<div class="editsection" style="float:right;margin-left:5px;">
Line 428:		Line 428:

	[[Category:Sexuality]]		[[Category:Sexuality]]
			[[Category:Resources]]

ZooWiki: The LinkTitles extension automatically added links to existing pages (https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles).

2021-06-07T16:34:01Z

The LinkTitles extension automatically added links to existing pages (<a rel="nofollow" class="external free" href="https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles">https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles</a>).

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:34, 7 June 2021
Line 15:		Line 15:
	== Is the animal humanized? ==		== Is the animal humanized? ==

	From some points of view: yes. A zoophile sees and treats his animal not only as an equal sexual partner, but mostly also as a life companion. Whether the animal is humanized depends on the one hand on the point of view and on the other hand on what is defined as "humanized".		From some points of view: yes. A [[zoophile]] sees and treats his animal not only as an equal sexual partner, but mostly also as a life companion. Whether the animal is humanized depends on the one hand on the point of view and on the other hand on what is defined as "humanized".

	<div class="editsection" style="float:right;margin-left:5px;">		<div class="editsection" style="float:right;margin-left:5px;">
Line 24:		Line 24:
	== Does man become an animal? ==		== Does man become an animal? ==

	No, humans and animals remain what they are. But zoophiles don't find the difference essential. In contrast to other people, for whom this difference is often very important. Even if animal behavior has to be discussed in order to communicate, this does not change anything.		No, humans and animals remain what they are. But [[zoophiles]] don't find the difference essential. In contrast to other people, for whom this difference is often very important. Even if animal behavior has to be discussed in order to communicate, this does not change anything.

	<br />		<br />
Line 36:		Line 36:
	== You have to have sex with an animal to be considered a Zoophile. ==		== You have to have sex with an animal to be considered a Zoophile. ==

	Not true. A person can be attracted to an animal much more than a traditional dog lover but does not need the sex included. Sex could be considered something "extra" to the relationship. But this is what separates the term for Bestiality, and [[Zoophilia]]. A person who only has an attraction to an animal is a Zoophile. One who only wants to have sex with the animal with no love in the picture is considered a beastlist.		Not true. A person can be attracted to an animal much more than a traditional dog lover but does not need the sex included. Sex could be considered something "extra" to the relationship. But this is what separates the term for [[Bestiality]], and [[Zoophilia]]. A person who only has an attraction to an animal is a Zoophile. One who only wants to have sex with the animal with no [[love]] in the picture is considered a beastlist.

	<br />		<br />
Line 126:		Line 126:
	== Do animals mate with other species on their own? ==		== Do animals mate with other species on their own? ==

	Yes, albeit rarely. Various cases are known in which animals have chosen a sexual partner of a different species. The fact that such events are rarely made public is due to the fact that most of the time no offspring are produced in such mating, and only in the rarest cases is a human observer present who records the event in a documentary way for other people. (See 3.21) More well-known are the cases that occur in zoos. There are crossbreeds between different big cats such as between lions and tigers, which have already been observed in the wild. Brown and polar bears also mate in zoos while they never meet in nature. The oldest document that is known to me and in which there is talk of cross-species mating,		Yes, albeit rarely. Various cases are known in which animals have chosen a sexual partner of a different species. The fact that such events are rarely made public is due to the fact that most of the time no offspring are produced in such mating, and only in the rarest cases is a human observer present who records the event in a documentary way for other people. (See 3.21) More well-known are the cases that occur in zoos. There are crossbreeds between different big cats such as between lions and tigers, which have already been observed in the wild. Brown and polar bears also [[mate]] in zoos while they never meet in nature. The oldest document that is known to me and in which there is talk of cross-species mating,

	(Picture elefnahs.jpg)		(Picture elefnahs.jpg)
Line 151:		Line 151:
	== Zoophiles are sick. ==		== Zoophiles are sick. ==

	Zoophilia is not classified as a disease in most countries, but as an additional sexual addiction. The classification of sexual diseases is now regulated worldwide exactly according to the information of the "American Psychiatric Association". The classifications and the classifications of sexual inclinations were laid down in a binding book called "DSM-IV" (old version still DSM-III-R). Zoophilia is classified as "minor" or "minor" paraphilia because of its lower frequency, as it is formulated there. Paraphilia is the modern, polite term for "perversion". Homosexuality and voluntary SM (Sado-Masocism), like zoophilia, used to be viewed as severe perversions. In the meantime, after this work, the two are no longer perversions.		Zoophilia is not classified as a disease in most countries, but as an additional sexual addiction. The classification of sexual diseases is now regulated worldwide exactly according to the information of the "American Psychiatric Association". The classifications and the classifications of sexual inclinations were laid down in a binding book called "DSM-IV" (old version still DSM-III-R). Zoophilia is classified as "minor" or "minor" [[paraphilia]] because of its lower frequency, as it is formulated there. Paraphilia is the modern, polite term for "perversion". Homosexuality and voluntary SM (Sado-Masocism), like zoophilia, used to be viewed as severe perversions. In the meantime, after this work, the two are no longer perversions.

	<br />		<br />
Line 192:		Line 192:
	== Aren't zoophilia suffering from their predisposition? ==		== Aren't zoophilia suffering from their predisposition? ==

	Nonsense, zoos don't suffer from having sex with animals, in fact they are very happy with it. They only suffer from the pressure of not being able to publicly admit it and of constantly having to lead a double life, as otherwise they could lose friends, family and jobs. The social taboo and the resulting isolation and feeling of guilt are more likely to be the trigger for depression, for example. This is why public acceptance of zoo sexuality is so important. Since the end of 1993 there has been a zoophile interest group IZM that wants to contribute.		Nonsense, zoos don't suffer from having sex with animals, in fact they are very happy with it. They only suffer from the pressure of not being able to publicly admit it and of constantly having to lead a double life, as otherwise they could lose friends, family and jobs. The social taboo and the resulting isolation and feeling of guilt are more likely to be the trigger for depression, for example. This is why public acceptance of zoo [[sexuality]] is so important. Since the end of 1993 there has been a zoophile interest group IZM that wants to contribute.

	<br />		<br />
Line 216:		Line 216:
	== Sex with animals is immoral / unethical. ==		== Sex with animals is immoral / unethical. ==

	That may be the case now, but it has not always been and will not always be so. A few decades ago, homosexuality was frowned upon and despised by society. Nowadays, with few exceptions, homosexuality is accepted by our society. Otherwise, I recommend taking a look at the oh-so-chaste Bible. Anyone leafing through an older complete edition will be taught better with regard to morals and ethics. Among other things, the first midwife in history was a pastor's daughter. That's right, in the past it was perfectly legitimate for priests to have offspring. So a thing that is considered highly immoral in the Christian world. Likewise, almost all women have been banned from the Bible and the Catholic world and replaced by men, where the names were replaced by similar ones from the world of men. Apparently very morally justifiable.		That may be the case now, but it has not always been and will not always be so. A few decades ago, homosexuality was frowned upon and despised by society. Nowadays, with few exceptions, homosexuality is accepted by our society. Otherwise, I recommend taking a look at the oh-so-chaste Bible. Anyone leafing through an older complete edition will be taught better with regard to morals and ethics. Among other things, the first midwife in [[history]] was a pastor's daughter. That's right, in the past it was perfectly legitimate for priests to have offspring. So a thing that is considered highly immoral in the Christian world. Likewise, almost all women have been banned from the Bible and the Catholic world and replaced by men, where the names were replaced by similar ones from the world of men. Apparently very morally justifiable.

	Elements of zoophilia can be found in the earliest mythologies, folk tales, and in the various cults and religions. In the fine arts and literature, too, zoophilia was and is again and again the subject of representation. While in our culture the zoophilia is met with aversion, in other cultures even the religions demanded coitus with "holy" animals as a cultic service. Today's symbol of medical ethics, the snake, was a living snake during the Aesculapian cult that was used sexually by girls and women in the temples of Aesculapius - "Aesculapius" is a Latinized form of the Greek god of medicine Asclepius .		Elements of zoophilia can be found in the earliest mythologies, folk tales, and in the various cults and religions. In the fine arts and [[literature]], too, zoophilia was and is again and again the subject of representation. While in our culture the zoophilia is met with aversion, in other cultures even the religions demanded coitus with "holy" animals as a cultic service. Today's symbol of medical ethics, the snake, was a living snake during the Aesculapian cult that was used sexually by girls and women in the temples of Aesculapius - "Aesculapius" is a Latinized form of the Greek god of medicine Asclepius .

	In Japan, sexual intercourse with animals was hardly ever disapproved. Sexual occurrences of this kind were generally not encouraged, but no severe bans were issued. The [https://web.archive.org/web/20070113165626/http://zoowiki.zetapin.de/index.php?title=Pferd horse] plays a special role in the imagination of the Japanese woman. The ancient expression "Uma-tawake" means doing nonsense or foolishness with a horse. In Japan, however, this word is also used quite generally as a term for zoophilia, sexual intercourse with animals in general.		In Japan, sexual intercourse with animals was hardly ever disapproved. Sexual occurrences of this kind were generally not encouraged, but no severe bans were issued. The [https://web.archive.org/web/20070113165626/http://zoowiki.zetapin.de/index.php?title=Pferd horse] plays a special role in the imagination of the Japanese woman. The ancient expression "Uma-tawake" means doing nonsense or foolishness with a [[horse]]. In Japan, however, this word is also used quite generally as a term for zoophilia, sexual intercourse with animals in general.

	<div class="editsection" style="float:right;margin-left:5px;">		<div class="editsection" style="float:right;margin-left:5px;">
Line 315:		Line 315:
	== Zoophiles have sex with animals when they are not harmed. ==		== Zoophiles have sex with animals when they are not harmed. ==

	This point has been and is pointed out several times in this FAQ because there are still many misunderstandings in connection with zoo sexuality. Where this misunderstanding comes from is unclear, probably from the press, which immediately equates animal abusers with zoosexuality instead of differentiating them out of convenience or ignorance. So it haunts many people that an animal suffers during sex with a person. That zoos do _not_ physical harm to their partners should be unmistakably clear to the reader of this ZOO FAQ at this point in time.		This point has been and is pointed out several times in this FAQ because there are still many misunderstandings in connection with zoo sexuality. Where this misunderstanding comes from is unclear, probably from the press, which immediately equates animal abusers with [[zoosexuality]] instead of differentiating them out of convenience or ignorance. So it haunts many people that an animal suffers during sex with a person. That zoos do _not_ physical harm to their partners should be unmistakably clear to the reader of this ZOO FAQ at this point in time.

	<div class="editsection" style="float:right;margin-left:5px;">		<div class="editsection" style="float:right;margin-left:5px;">
Line 369:		Line 369:
	== Zoophilia can therefore be presented as a variant of love for animals. ==		== Zoophilia can therefore be presented as a variant of love for animals. ==

	Yes, many like animals. It is all the more peculiar, however, that almost all of their animals deny their animals any sexuality. Bitches are sterilized or given medication to suppress their heat. Males are stuffed full of drive-suppressing tablets, or they are completely emasculated. And why the whole thing? Because it doesn't fit the picture of the cute little cuddly toy when Fifi suddenly clings to his owner's leg or Asta puts her tail to one side when you stroke her back. Animals have to be kind and innocent! Most people don't want to have anything to do with the fact that they, too, are drive-controlled beings with sexual needs!		Yes, many like animals. It is all the more peculiar, however, that almost all of their animals deny their animals any sexuality. Bitches are sterilized or given medication to suppress their [[heat]]. Males are stuffed full of drive-suppressing tablets, or they are completely emasculated. And why the whole thing? Because it doesn't fit the picture of the cute little cuddly toy when Fifi suddenly clings to his owner's leg or Asta puts her tail to one side when you stroke her back. Animals have to be kind and innocent! Most people don't want to have anything to do with the fact that they, too, are drive-controlled beings with sexual needs!

	<br />		<br />

ZooWiki at 07:49, 7 June 2021

2021-06-07T07:49:56Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:49, 7 June 2021
Line 34:		Line 34:

	</div>		</div>
			== You have to have sex with an animal to be considered a Zoophile. ==

			Not true. A person can be attracted to an animal much more than a traditional dog lover but does not need the sex included. Sex could be considered something "extra" to the relationship. But this is what separates the term for Bestiality, and [[Zoophilia]]. A person who only has an attraction to an animal is a Zoophile. One who only wants to have sex with the animal with no love in the picture is considered a beastlist.

			<br />


			<div class="editsection" style="float:right;margin-left:5px;">

	== Can or does an animal want to have sex with humans? ==		== Can or does an animal want to have sex with humans? ==