Template:Did You Know?/1: Difference between revisions

From Zoophilia Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
SockyPaws (talk | contribs)
m SockyPaws moved page Template:/Did you know/1 to Template:Did You Know?/1: Misspelled title: Shouldn't these all be subpages of the titular template? Plus, starting any page name with a virgule is just ''asking'' for a fight with the parser
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div style="float:right;margin-top:0.3em;">[[File:DYK questionmark icon.svg|50px|right|Question mark]]</div>
<div style="float: right; margin: 0.3em 1em;">[[File:Updated DYK query.svg|50px|Question mark]]</div>
*...that [[Zoosexuality]] was a term that can be sourced back to the original [[Hani Miletski's Chat Logs]] can be traced back to the user "Doggie" These logs can be seen in [[Hani Miletski]]'s book [[Understanding Bestiality and Zoophilia]].
* …that [[zoosexuality]] was a term that can be sourced back to the original [[Hani Miletski]]'s [[Hani Miletski's Chat Logs|chat logs]] by the user "Doggie"? These logs were published in her book, [[Understanding Bestiality and Zoophilia]].


*...that Zoosexuality is a value-neutral term covering the spectrum of human-animal sexuality, and implies nothing more than a person with an orientation towards animals. This is a loving and non-violent, incidental intermittent or long-term, actual or wished-for, fantasy or reality. Also, similarly to other orientations such as homosexuality and heterosexuality, it may be "exclusive" in nature, or one of a range of sexual focuses - the person may have human partners as well, and their relationships may be authentically relational or otherwise.
* …that zoosexuality is a value-neutral term covering the spectrum of human-animal sexuality, implying nothing more than a person with an orientation towards animals? That orientation traverses an incredibly wide spectrum, too! It is…
** Loving and non-violent
** Incidental, intermittent or prolonged
** Fantastical or physical
** Overtly cultivated or generously reactive
: And just as with homosexuality and heterosexuality, it may be "exclusive" in nature, or merely one facet of a range of sexual expressions. A zoophile may have human partners as well, and those relationships are no less likely to be authentic and cherished than a non-zoophile's.

Latest revision as of 16:44, 21 November 2024

Question mark
  • …that zoosexuality is a value-neutral term covering the spectrum of human-animal sexuality, implying nothing more than a person with an orientation towards animals? That orientation traverses an incredibly wide spectrum, too! It is…
    • Loving and non-violent
    • Incidental, intermittent or prolonged
    • Fantastical or physical
    • Overtly cultivated or generously reactive
And just as with homosexuality and heterosexuality, it may be "exclusive" in nature, or merely one facet of a range of sexual expressions. A zoophile may have human partners as well, and those relationships are no less likely to be authentic and cherished than a non-zoophile's.