Template:Unreliable source?: Difference between revisions
From Zoophilia Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
meta>Cri du canard (superscript to conform to other tags) |
meta>Selmo (→See also: redirects) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
For whole sections or articles, use [[Template:Not verified]]. | For whole sections or articles, use [[Template:Not verified]]. | ||
==Redirects== | |||
{{tl|vc}} | |||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
{{style}} | {{style}} | ||
Revision as of 03:32, 2 December 2006
[please verify the credibility of this source]
This template will categorise tagged articles into Category:Wikipedia articles needing factual verification.
Please add this template after a good faith attempt to verify the reliability of the source in question.
For whole sections or articles, use Template:Not verified.
Redirects
{{vc}}
See also
- Template:Citation style
- Template:Citequote
- Template:Cleanup-list
- Template:Cleanup-rewrite
- Template:Confusing
- Template:Context
- Template:Contradict
- Template:Copyedit
- Template:Fact — adds:[citation needed]
- Template:Fiction
- Template:Globalize
- Template:Importance
- Template:Inappropriate tone
- Template:Not verified
- Template:Expert
- Template:Original research
- Template:PotentialVanity
- Template:Primarysources
- Template:Technical
- Template:Uncategorized
- Template:Unreferenced, Template:Unsourced
- Template:Verify source, Template:Check
- Template:Wikify
- Wikipedia:Template messages/Cleanup
