Template:Unreliable source?: Difference between revisions
From Zoophilia Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
meta>SMcCandlish m (class="noprint") |
meta>SMcCandlish (Handwringing language fix; character entities fix.) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<sup class="noprint"> | <sup class="noprint">[''the [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|credibility of this source]] needs to be [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verified]]'']</sup> <includeonly>[[Category:Wikipedia articles needing factual verification]]</includeonly><noinclude> | ||
---- | ---- | ||
This template will categorise tagged articles into [[:Category:Wikipedia articles needing factual verification]]. | This template will categorise tagged articles into [[:Category:Wikipedia articles needing factual verification]]. | ||
Revision as of 02:08, 11 December 2006
[the credibility of this source needs to be verified]
This template will categorise tagged articles into Category:Wikipedia articles needing factual verification.
Please add this template after a good faith attempt to verify the reliability of the source in question.
For whole sections or articles, use Template:Not verified.
Shortcuts
{{vc}}
See also
- Template:Citation style
- Template:Citequote
- Template:Cleanup-list
- Template:Cleanup-rewrite
- Template:Confusing
- Template:Context
- Template:Contradict
- Template:Copyedit
- Template:Fact — adds:[citation needed]
- Template:Fiction
- Template:Globalize
- Template:Importance
- Template:Inappropriate tone
- Template:Not verified
- Template:Expert
- Template:Original research
- Template:PotentialVanity
- Template:Primarysources
- Template:Technical
- Template:Uncategorized
- Template:Unreferenced, Template:Unsourced
- Template:Verify source, Template:Check
- Template:Wikify
- Wikipedia:Template messages/Cleanup
