Execution of George Spencer: Difference between revisions

From Zoophilia Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
meta>Violetriga
m avoid redirect
meta>Yngvadottir
Line 9: Line 9:
Spencer was told that "he that confesseth and forsaketh his sins shall finde mercie",<ref name="Murrin" /> but it was never made clear to him whether this mercy related to the proceedings of the court or those of God.<ref name="Chapin" />  Having witnessed a repentant child molester being whipped for his crime Spencer believed that his best option was to confess.<ref name="Murrin" />  On the realisation that this might lead to a death sentence he retracted his statement.  He repeated this confession and retraction again, trying to find the best solution to his situation.<ref name="Murrin" /><ref name="Graham" /><ref name="Dikes" />
Spencer was told that "he that confesseth and forsaketh his sins shall finde mercie",<ref name="Murrin" /> but it was never made clear to him whether this mercy related to the proceedings of the court or those of God.<ref name="Chapin" />  Having witnessed a repentant child molester being whipped for his crime Spencer believed that his best option was to confess.<ref name="Murrin" />  On the realisation that this might lead to a death sentence he retracted his statement.  He repeated this confession and retraction again, trying to find the best solution to his situation.<ref name="Murrin" /><ref name="Graham" /><ref name="Dikes" />


When the trial began the magistrates knew the necessity of having two witnesses to the crime.  They used Spencer's retracted confessions as one witness and the stillborn piglet at the other, ruling that this was sufficient to determine his guilt.<ref name="Murrin" /><ref name="Graham" /><ref name="Cressy" /><ref name="Dikes" /><ref name="Chapin" />  On April 8, 1642 the sow was put to death by the sword and Spencer was hanged.<ref name="Murrin" />
When the trial began the magistrates knew the necessity of having two witnesses to the crime.  They used Spencer's retracted confessions as one witness and the stillborn piglet as the other, ruling that this was sufficient to determine his guilt.<ref name="Murrin" /><ref name="Graham" /><ref name="Cressy" /><ref name="Dikes" /><ref name="Chapin" />  On April 8, 1642 the sow was put to death by the sword and Spencer was hanged.<ref name="Murrin" />


Spencer's death was early in the history of New England and is reported to be only the second execution to take place in Connecticut and the first of a non-Native American.<ref>[http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/documents/ESPYyear.pdf Executions is the U.S. 1608-2002: The ESPY File]. ''Death Penalty Information Center''. p.1. Accessed November 1, 2011.</ref>
Spencer's death was early in the history of New England and is reported to be only the second execution to take place in Connecticut and the first of a non-Native American.<ref>[http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/documents/ESPYyear.pdf Executions is the U.S. 1608-2002: The ESPY File]. ''Death Penalty Information Center''. p.1. Accessed November 1, 2011.</ref>

Revision as of 16:35, 12 November 2011

George Spencer (c.1600 – April 8, 1642) was the first non-native person to be executed in Connecticut. Amongst his charges was sodomy after an alleged sexual act with an animal.

Biography

George Spencer is described as an ugly, balding servant with a fake eye.[1][2] He is believed to have lived for a time in Boston and while there was found guilty of receiving stolen goods.[1] His punishment was a flogging. He then moved to the New Haven Colony,[1] and continued to be a "habitual troublemaker".[2] He was open about his lack of faith, never praying in the years of being in New England and only reading the Bible when forced to by his master.[1][3] He had regularly been accused of illegal and even depraved acts by neighbours, but evidence of his wrongdoings were never more compelling than the discovery in early 1642.[4]

Trial and execution

In February 1642, a deformed piglet was found near its mother. The stillborn animal had one large eye and was said to resemble Spencer sufficiently to arouse suspicion of its origins. Spencer was arrested, and the Puritan society deemed the birth a work of God. They believed that this was irrefutable evidence that an act of bestiality had taken place.[5] He was charged with "prophane, atheistical carriage, in unfaithfulness and stubbornness to his master, a course of notorious lying, filthiness, scoffing at the ordinances, ways and people of God".[3]

Spencer was told that "he that confesseth and forsaketh his sins shall finde mercie",[1] but it was never made clear to him whether this mercy related to the proceedings of the court or those of God.[5] Having witnessed a repentant child molester being whipped for his crime Spencer believed that his best option was to confess.[1] On the realisation that this might lead to a death sentence he retracted his statement. He repeated this confession and retraction again, trying to find the best solution to his situation.[1][2][4]

When the trial began the magistrates knew the necessity of having two witnesses to the crime. They used Spencer's retracted confessions as one witness and the stillborn piglet as the other, ruling that this was sufficient to determine his guilt.[1][2][3][4][5] On April 8, 1642 the sow was put to death by the sword and Spencer was hanged.[1]

Spencer's death was early in the history of New England and is reported to be only the second execution to take place in Connecticut and the first of a non-Native American.[6]

Similar cases

In 1645, Thomas Hogg, another servant in New Haven, was imprisoned for several months for very similar crimes. A sow gave birth to two deformed piglets that resembled Hogg but he never confessed to the crime and the requirement of finding two witnesses could not be met.[1]

References

  1. 1.00 1.01 1.02 1.03 1.04 1.05 1.06 1.07 1.08 1.09 Murrin, John M. "Things Fearful to Name": Bestiality in Colonial America. Princeton University. Accessed November 1, 2011.
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 Graham, Judith S. Puritan Family Life: The Diary of Samuel Sewall. UPNE. 2003. p.76. Accessed November 1, 2011.
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 Cressy, David. Coming over: migration and communication between England and New England in the seventeenth century. Cambridge University Press. 1987. p.101. Accessed November 1, 2011.
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 Dikes, Jason. Massachusetts Sex Ways: Puritan Ideas of Flesh and the Spirit. Austin Community College. p.4. Accessed November 1, 2011.
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 Chapin, Bradley. Criminal Justice in Colonial America, 1606-1660. University of Georgia Press. 2010. pp.38–39. Accessed November 1, 2011.
  6. Executions is the U.S. 1608-2002: The ESPY File. Death Penalty Information Center. p.1. Accessed November 1, 2011.