Template:Dubious: Difference between revisions
From Zoophilia Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
meta>SMcCandlish m Revert; "clutters up the text when editing and may not be understood by new editors" applies to articles not templates; that passage in WP:DASH conflicts with rest of and is disputed. |
meta>TadejM m +iw: sl:Predloga:Dvomljivo |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
[[Category:Citation and verifiability maintenance templates|{{PAGENAME}}]] | [[Category:Citation and verifiability maintenance templates|{{PAGENAME}}]] | ||
[[Category:Inline templates|{{PAGENAME}}]] | [[Category:Inline templates|{{PAGENAME}}]] | ||
[[sl:Predloga:Dvomljivo]] | |||
</noinclude> | </noinclude> | ||
Revision as of 09:05, 14 May 2007
Usage
Add {{Dubious}} after a fact or posit to signify that just that statement may not be entirely factual or accurate. To specify a section of the discussion on the talk page, use {{Dubious|talk page section name}}.
Do not add this to a page more than a reasonable number of times. Please consider using one of the other templates mentioned below instead.
{{Wikipedia:Resolving Disputes/Templates}}
