Template:Unreliable source?: Difference between revisions
From Zoophilia Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
meta>Esprit15d →See also: Template:Citequote |
meta>Cri du canard superscript to conform to other tags |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'' | <sup>[''please [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verify]] the [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|credibility of this source]]'']</sup> <includeonly>[[Category:Wikipedia articles needing factual verification]]</includeonly><noinclude> | ||
---- | ---- | ||
This template will categorise tagged articles into [[:Category:Wikipedia articles needing factual verification]]. | This template will categorise tagged articles into [[:Category:Wikipedia articles needing factual verification]]. | ||
Revision as of 23:52, 13 August 2006
[please verify the credibility of this source]
This template will categorise tagged articles into Category:Wikipedia articles needing factual verification.
Please add this template after a good faith attempt to verify the reliability of the source in question.
For whole sections or articles, use Template:Not verified.
See also
- Template:Citation style
- Template:Citequote
- Template:Cleanup-list
- Template:Cleanup-rewrite
- Template:Confusing
- Template:Context
- Template:Contradict
- Template:Copyedit
- Template:Fact — adds: [citation needed]
- Template:Fiction
- Template:Globalize
- Template:Importance
- Template:Inappropriate tone
- Template:Not verified
- Template:Expert
- Template:Original research
- Template:PotentialVanity
- Template:Primarysources
- Template:Technical
- Template:Uncategorized
- Template:Unreferenced, Template:Unsourced
- Template:Verify source, Template:Check
- Template:Wikify
- Wikipedia:Template messages/Cleanup
