Template:Unreliable source?: Difference between revisions
From Zoophilia Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
meta>Interiot update the "reliable sources" link to point to Wikipedia:Attribution too |
meta>Centrx Link instead to more appropriate WP:RS and WP:V rather than proposal |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<sup class="noprint">[''<span title="The material in the vicinity of this tag may cite questionable sources." style="white-space: nowrap;">this source's [[Wikipedia: | <sup class="noprint">[''<span title="The material in the vicinity of this tag may cite questionable sources." style="white-space: nowrap;">this source's [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliability]] may need [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verification]]</span>'']</sup> <includeonly>[[Category:Wikipedia articles needing factual verification]]</includeonly><noinclude> | ||
{{protected template}} | {{protected template}} | ||
---- | ---- |
Revision as of 03:12, 15 April 2007
[this source's reliability may need verification] Template:Protected template
This template will categorise tagged articles into Category:Wikipedia articles needing factual verification.
Please add this template after a good faith attempt to verify the reliability of the source in question.
For whole sections or articles, use Template:Not verified.
Shortcuts
{{vc}}
See also
- Template:Citation style
- Template:Citequote
- Template:Cleanup-list
- Template:Cleanup-rewrite
- Template:Confusing
- Template:Context
- Template:Contradict
- Template:Copyedit
- Template:Fact — adds: [citation needed]
- Template:Fiction
- Template:Globalize
- Template:Importance
- Template:Inappropriate tone
- Template:Not verified
- Template:Expert
- Template:Original research
- Template:Primarysources
- Template:Technical
- Template:Uncategorized
- Template:Unreferenced, Template:Unsourced
- Template:Verify source, Template:Check
- Template:Wikify
- Wikipedia:Template messages/Cleanup