Template:Unreliable source?: Difference between revisions
From Zoophilia Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
meta>Centrx (Link instead to more appropriate WP:RS and WP:V rather than proposal) |
meta>CBM (Update categories per talk page request) |
||
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
* [[Template:Wikify]] | * [[Template:Wikify]] | ||
* [[Wikipedia:Template messages/Cleanup]] | * [[Wikipedia:Template messages/Cleanup]] | ||
[[Category: | |||
[[Category:Inline templates|{{PAGENAME}}]] | |||
[[Category:Citation and verifiability maintenance templates|{{PAGENAME}}]] | |||
</noinclude> | </noinclude> |
Revision as of 12:20, 15 April 2007
[this source's reliability may need verification] Template:Protected template
This template will categorise tagged articles into Category:Wikipedia articles needing factual verification.
Please add this template after a good faith attempt to verify the reliability of the source in question.
For whole sections or articles, use Template:Not verified.
Shortcuts
{{vc}}
See also
- Template:Citation style
- Template:Citequote
- Template:Cleanup-list
- Template:Cleanup-rewrite
- Template:Confusing
- Template:Context
- Template:Contradict
- Template:Copyedit
- Template:Fact — adds:[citation needed]
- Template:Fiction
- Template:Globalize
- Template:Importance
- Template:Inappropriate tone
- Template:Not verified
- Template:Expert
- Template:Original research
- Template:Primarysources
- Template:Technical
- Template:Uncategorized
- Template:Unreferenced, Template:Unsourced
- Template:Verify source, Template:Check
- Template:Wikify
- Wikipedia:Template messages/Cleanup