Template:POV check: Difference between revisions

From Zoophilia Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
meta>Joy
explicated that it's the phrasing that may need to be discussed, not the lack of a specific dispute :)
meta>Eloquence
"should be" implies that whoever put the POV check template on an article is correct. rephrase.
Line 3: Line 3:
backgroundcolor = WhiteSmoke|
backgroundcolor = WhiteSmoke|
image =Stop_hand.png|
image =Stop_hand.png|
heading =This article should be amended to conform to a [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view]].|
heading =This article may require editing to conform to the [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view]] policy.|
message =Currently there may not be a [[Wikipedia:NPOV dispute|specific dispute]], but the phrasing may need discussion on the [[Talk:{{PAGENAME}}|talk page]].}}
message =A Wikipedia user has nominated this article to be checked for its neutrality. Currently there may not be a [[Wikipedia:NPOV dispute|specific dispute]], but the content may need discussion on the [[Talk:{{PAGENAME}}|talk page]].}}
[[Category:Articles which may be biased]]
[[Category:Articles which may be biased]]

Revision as of 00:28, 4 February 2005