Bestiality Pornography - The misrepresentation of Zoophilia

Place holder to be worked on later

Introduction

Pornography has been around for centuries. From cave paintings, to to film, and electronic media.

The oldest artifacts considered pornographic were discovered in Germany in 2008 CE and are dated to be at least 35,000 years old. Throughout the history of erotic depictions, various people made attempts to suppress them under obscenity laws, censor, or make them illegal.

The history of Zoophilia has varied from the prehistoric era, where depictions of bestiality appear in European rock art, to the Middle Ages, where bestiality was met with execution.

One of the oldest films relating to Bestiality was "Animal Farm." That was smuggled into Great Britain around 1980, with little information about its makers.. The film was later traced to a crude juxtaposition of smuggled cuts from many of Bodil Joensen's 1970s Danish movies

Production

Due to source limitations, not much information can be obtained on past productions. Certain studios that may be familiar to some readers are Petlust. A production studio featuring guys with animals. Zooskool (Now ArtofZoo) featuring women with animals. Along with some other producers.

Sourcing

The methods by which animals are obtained for these productions are often undocumented. Speculation suggests that older producers might have used farms where owners welcomed filming, dogs provided by the actors/actresses, or other undisclosed sources.

For the money, or the love?

Much of the zoophilia pornography produced by "commercial producers" is assumed to be driven by financial motives. This speculation arises from the observation of certain scenes, such as old Brazilian films involving horses, which did not accurately represent real horse semen. The disconnect between the depicted content and reality suggests a focus on commercial appeal rather than authenticity.

The makers of Bestiality Porn

Anthropologist Paul Mellars of Stony Brook University in New York state suggests that the focus on exaggerated sexual features in ancient artifacts fits with other findings from the period, including phalluses carved out of bison horn and vulva inscribed on rocks. "It's sexually exaggerated to the point of being pornographic," Mellars says. "There's all this sexual symbolism bubbling up in that period. They were sex-mad." Conard used radiocarbon dates from bones and other artifacts found nearby to date the figurine. "It's at least 35,000 calendar years old, but I think it's much older than that," Conard says.

The Dark Side of Zoophilia Porn

The Dark Side of Porn. It gets more focus on how Zoophilia is. Making viewers believe this is the meaning of Zoophilia.

It's called Zoosadism. Zoosadism means a derivation of pleasure or sexual gratification from suffering or humiliation of animals. Including acts of cruelty, violence, or exploitation that goes beyond consensual interactions.

Misrepresentation in Zoosadistic Content

1. Exaggerated Suffering: Zoosadistic content often exaggerates the suffering of animals to enhance the viewing experience, leading to a misrepresentation of the true extent of animal distress.
2. Lack of Context: These productions frequently lack context, failing to show the long-term effects of the depicted acts on the animals involved.
3. Glamorization of Cruelty: Zoosadistic content often glamorizes acts of cruelty, presenting them as acceptable or even desirable, which can mislead viewers about the reality of animal suffering.
4. Misleading Titles and Descriptions: Titles and descriptions of zoosadistic content may be misleading, downplaying the extent of animal cruelty or presenting it as consensual bestiality.
5. Showing off their animals in the normal world: Zoosadists typically like to show their dogs out in the world, making it seem like they're happy and enjoy their owners. However, looking closely, seeing their body language is more important. What they don't want you to see, is how the animal would react if they did something wrong.

The Illusion of Happiness

Zoosadists carefully stage public appearances to make their animals seem happy and obedient. They may use positive reinforcement or other training techniques to ensure the animal behaves as desired in public. This controlled environment can deceive observers into believing that the animal is genuinely content and enjoys its owner's company.

Example: A zoosadist might walk their dog in a park, where the animal appears to be a well-behaved and happy companion. The dog may be on a leash, sitting calmly beside its owner, and even interacting playfully with other dogs or people. This public display can create the impression that the animal is well-cared for and enjoys its life with its owner.

Reading Body Language

While the public display may seem idyllic, a closer look at the animal's body language can reveal underlying issues. Zoosadists often overlook or ignore the subtle signs of stress, fear, or discomfort that their animals may exhibit. These signs can be crucial in understanding the true nature of the animal's well-being and its relationship with its owner.

Signs of Discomfort:

• Tensed Muscles: Animals may hold their muscles tense, indicating stress or anxiety.
• Avoidance Behaviors: Animals may try to avoid eye contact, turn their head away, or attempt to move away from their owner.
• Submissive Postures: Animals may adopt submissive postures, such as crouching or lowering their body, as a sign of fear or deference.
• Excessive Panting or Drooling: These can be indicators of stress or anxiety, even if the animal appears calm on the surface.

The Hidden Reality

Zoosadists often go to great lengths to hide the true nature of their interactions with their animals. They may use positive reinforcement in public to mask the underlying control or coercion. What they don't want observers to see is how the animal would react if it did something wrong or displeased its owner. Hidden Consequences:

• Punishment: Animals may face severe punishment or abuse if they do not comply with their owner's expectations or make a mistake. This can include physical punishment, verbal abuse, or other forms of control.
• Isolation: Animals may be isolated or confined as a form of punishment, leading to further stress and anxiety.
• Manipulation: Zoosadists may use manipulation tactics, such as withholding food, water, or affection, to control their animals' behavior and emotions.

Short-Term Effects

1. Physical Injuries: Animals involved in these productions may suffer physical injuries, ranging from minor to severe, depending on the nature of the acts performed.
2. Psychological Trauma: The psychological impact on animals can be significant, leading to stress, anxiety, and behavioral changes.

Long-Term Effects

1. Chronic Health Issues: Prolonged involvement in such productions can result in chronic health issues for the animals, affecting their quality of life.
2. Reproductive and Developmental Problems: Exposure to stressful or harmful conditions can lead to reproductive and developmental problems in animals.