Christianity and Zoosexuality

If you are a Christian zoophile, I know how challenging it can be to discover your zoophilia and mend these two things. I am not going to trample on your Christian faith. I know very well the reasons why you keep your faith. It is a wholesome, simple life and one that allows endurance, unlike any other religion I’ve seen.

What I’d like to do, is to strengthen your Christian faith while possibly mending your peace with God and zoophilia, or start you on the track to finding that peace. There are many interpretations of the bible, and perhaps you as a Christian have not known the more hidden, obscure interpretations. Even one possibly that may condone a zoophilic lifestyle albeit with the traditional Christian restraint.

For a better understanding of this very foreign and very controversial concept in Christianity, let's examine the position Judaism takes towards Genesis 2:23. The following is taken from the Jewish Bible with Rashi's commentary.

Gen 2:23 - And man said, "This time, it is bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh. This one shall be called Isiah (woman) because this one was taken from ish (man)."

Rashi’s Commentary for Gen 2:23 - This teaches us that Adam came to all the animals and the beasts [in search of a mate], but he was not satisfied until he found Eve. — [from Yev. 63A]

• Rashi references from the Jewish Talmud, Yebamoth 63a.

Yebamoth 63a states “What is meant by the Scriptural text, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh?13 This teaches that Adam had intercourse with every beast and animal but found no satisfaction until he cohabited with Eve.”

So there, we have something quite significant for zoophiles. The Jewish faith and interpretation clearly show that the LORD brought adam to have sexual relations with all the beasts of the field but was not satisfied until he eve was made. I’m sure this is shocking to some of you listening, but please, the Jewish rabbis are very shrewd in their interpretations, and why did they choose this very uncommon commentary? There must be a biblical reason why they interpreted Genesis 2:23 that way, and there is. Now grab your King James Bible, and let us look at why the rabbi interpreted Adam's bestiality as so. Let's read Genesis 2:18-20

• Genesis 2:18-20
  • 18 And the LORD God said, It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him an help meet for him.
  • 19 And out of the ground the LORD God formed every beast of the field, and every fowl of the air; and brought them unto Adam to see what he would call them: and whatsoever Adam called every living creature, that was the name thereof.
  • 20 And Adam gave names to all cattle, and to the fowl of the air, and to every beast of the field; but for Adam there was not found an help meet for him.