Human–animal marriage: Difference between revisions
meta>CoffeeWithMarkets No edit summary |
meta>Niceguyedc m (v1.38 - Repaired 2 links to disambiguation pages - (You can help) - Enlightenment, Magic / WP:WCW project (Spelling and typography)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Human–animal marriage''' is a concept not recognized in [[law]] by any state, although attempts to [[marriage|marry]] [[human]]s to other [[animal]]s have been recorded.{{cn|date=April 2016}} The topic has frequently existed in terms of [[ | '''Human–animal marriage''' is a concept not recognized in [[law]] by any state, although attempts to [[marriage|marry]] [[human]]s to other [[animal]]s have been recorded.{{cn|date=April 2016}} The topic has frequently existed in terms of [[magic in fiction|magical]] fiction, in contrast to those with [[Rationalism|rationalist]] perspectives.<ref name="Germany"/> | ||
==Background and context== | ==Background and context== | ||
[[Folklore]] relationships between [[human beings]] and non-human [[animals]] exist throughout many different [[Culture|cultures]] in varying ways given the diversity of [[Mythology|mythological stories]]. Generally speaking, however, analysis by scholars such as [[Lutz Röhrich]] have found common elements in that [[domesticated animals]] appear to flourish in these tales only after [[Agriculture|agricultural]] civilization develops. Animals perceived as being fundamentally 'wild', such as [[ants]] and [[fish]], possess abilities that assist [[protagonists]] while still exercising independent natures, such as fish choosing to retrieve things accidentally discarded in water. Closer association with humans and a sense of being less dangerous correlates with higher perceived intelligence and notions of human-animal bonding. In tales from Africa to Australia to North America and elsewhere, many [[ | [[Folklore]] relationships between [[human beings]] and non-human [[animals]] exist throughout many different [[Culture|cultures]] in varying ways given the diversity of [[Mythology|mythological stories]]. Generally speaking, however, analysis by scholars such as [[Lutz Röhrich]] have found common elements in that [[domesticated animals]] appear to flourish in these tales only after [[Agriculture|agricultural]] civilization develops. Animals perceived as being fundamentally 'wild', such as [[ants]] and [[fish]], possess abilities that assist [[protagonists]] while still exercising independent natures, such as fish choosing to retrieve things accidentally discarded in water. Closer association with humans and a sense of being less dangerous correlates with higher perceived intelligence and notions of human-animal bonding. In tales from Africa to Australia to North America and elsewhere, many [[origin myth]]s view animals and humans descending together into Earth; a great many stories chronicled pre-[[Age of Enlightenment|Enlightenment]] depict the likes of [[cats]], [[dogs]], and [[roosters]] interacting with people at a roughly even level.<ref name="Germany">{{citebook|title=Folklore Theory in Postwar Germany|first=Sadhana|last=Naithani|pages=48-52|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=sPYaBwAAQBAJ&pg=PA52&dq=%22human-animal+marriage%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiludq5ppHMAhVln4MKHfUNDM8Q6AEIKzAD#v=onepage&q=%22human-animal%20marriage%22&f=false|date=2014|ISBN=9781617039942|publisher=University Press of Mississippi}}</ref> | ||
Human-animal marriages specifically are a theme in many mythological stories. In the more recent European context, stories are far more likely to relate to humans turning into animals as a form of [[humiliation]] and setting what has been done right becomes a protagonist burden. In other, older tribal contexts, a noted fluidity exists, such as animals switching forms at will into humans. The more recent, European folktales generally refrain from depicting the human and animal couplings in that fashion. Particularly, the marriages do not involve sexual relations between the human and animal partners. The philosophical [[hierarchy]] of humanity above regular animal life is directly implied. The rise of modern civilization and the spread of rationalist thinking, in folktale storytelling terms, mean not just more defined lines between people and regular animals but also an increased sense of detachment and disenchantment: humans as more alien from nature.<ref name="Germany"/> | Human-animal marriages specifically are a theme in many mythological stories. In the more recent European context, stories are far more likely to relate to humans turning into animals as a form of [[humiliation]] and setting what has been done right becomes a protagonist burden. In other, older tribal contexts, a noted fluidity exists, such as animals switching forms at will into humans. The more recent, European folktales generally refrain from depicting the human and animal couplings in that fashion. Particularly, the marriages do not involve sexual relations between the human and animal partners. The philosophical [[hierarchy]] of humanity above regular animal life is directly implied. The rise of modern civilization and the spread of rationalist thinking, in folktale storytelling terms, mean not just more defined lines between people and regular animals but also an increased sense of detachment and disenchantment: humans as more alien from nature.<ref name="Germany"/> | ||
Revision as of 11:50, 17 April 2016
Human–animal marriage is a concept not recognized in law by any state, although attempts to marry humans to other animals have been recorded.[citation needed] The topic has frequently existed in terms of magical fiction, in contrast to those with rationalist perspectives.[1]
Background and context
Folklore relationships between human beings and non-human animals exist throughout many different cultures in varying ways given the diversity of mythological stories. Generally speaking, however, analysis by scholars such as Lutz Röhrich have found common elements in that domesticated animals appear to flourish in these tales only after agricultural civilization develops. Animals perceived as being fundamentally 'wild', such as ants and fish, possess abilities that assist protagonists while still exercising independent natures, such as fish choosing to retrieve things accidentally discarded in water. Closer association with humans and a sense of being less dangerous correlates with higher perceived intelligence and notions of human-animal bonding. In tales from Africa to Australia to North America and elsewhere, many origin myths view animals and humans descending together into Earth; a great many stories chronicled pre-Enlightenment depict the likes of cats, dogs, and roosters interacting with people at a roughly even level.[1]
Human-animal marriages specifically are a theme in many mythological stories. In the more recent European context, stories are far more likely to relate to humans turning into animals as a form of humiliation and setting what has been done right becomes a protagonist burden. In other, older tribal contexts, a noted fluidity exists, such as animals switching forms at will into humans. The more recent, European folktales generally refrain from depicting the human and animal couplings in that fashion. Particularly, the marriages do not involve sexual relations between the human and animal partners. The philosophical hierarchy of humanity above regular animal life is directly implied. The rise of modern civilization and the spread of rationalist thinking, in folktale storytelling terms, mean not just more defined lines between people and regular animals but also an increased sense of detachment and disenchantment: humans as more alien from nature.[1]
See also
References
| Zoophilia | |
|---|---|
| Related subjects | |
| Animal Health | |
