Legality of bestiality by country or territory: Revision history

From Zoophilia Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

Diff selection: Mark the radio buttons of the revisions to compare and hit enter or the button at the bottom.
Legend: (cur) = difference with latest revision, (prev) = difference with preceding revision, m = minor edit.

(newest | oldest) View (newer 500 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

26 November 2023

18 April 2023

15 April 2023

14 April 2023

13 April 2023

7 June 2021

  • curprev 16:3216:32, 7 June 2021ZooWiki talk contribsm 117,778 bytes +12 The LinkTitles extension automatically added links to existing pages (<a rel="nofollow" class="external free" href="https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles">https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles</a>).

31 August 2020

22 August 2020

  • curprev 11:3411:34, 22 August 2020Adam52 talk contribs 117,766 bytes +117,766 Created page with "{{short description|Laws governing humans performing sex acts with non-human animals}} {{Use dmy dates|date=February 2020}} {{Sex and the law}} '''Legality of bestiality by co..."

7 July 2016

28 June 2016

24 June 2016

14 June 2016

13 June 2016

12 June 2016

21 May 2016

29 April 2016

17 April 2016

2 April 2016

8 March 2016

6 March 2016

21 February 2016

19 February 2016

18 February 2016

2 February 2016

16 January 2016

  • curprev 01:1901:19, 16 January 2016meta>Cyberbot II 37,662 bytes +242 Rescuing 2 sources, flagging 0 as dead, and archiving 57 sources. #IABot

11 January 2016

4 January 2016

24 December 2015

23 December 2015

15 December 2015

4 December 2015

19 November 2015

12 September 2015

29 August 2015

20 July 2015

5 July 2015

30 June 2015

27 June 2015

23 May 2015

29 April 2015

22 April 2015

21 April 2015

10 April 2015

14 February 2015

5 February 2015

4 February 2015

24 January 2015

14 January 2015

29 October 2014

25 October 2014

16 October 2014

13 October 2014

9 October 2014

6 October 2014

16 September 2014

13 September 2014

9 September 2014

16 August 2014

10 August 2014

5 August 2014

16 July 2014

13 July 2014

11 July 2014

9 July 2014

7 July 2014

2 July 2014

5 June 2014

4 June 2014

21 May 2014

18 May 2014

  • curprev 19:5819:58, 18 May 2014meta>Z07x10 31,360 bytes −232 Russia removed. The link provided did not say it was legal in Russia, it is still a criminal offence, just not specifically a a sex crime, as is the case for France, also mentioned in same link.

15 May 2014

13 May 2014

12 May 2014

5 May 2014

1 May 2014

21 April 2014

15 April 2014

7 April 2014

6 April 2014

  • curprev 23:3523:35, 6 April 2014meta>Dinobass 30,054 bytes −234 Undid revision 602721042 by AnomieBOT (talk) reverted good faith edit. those references are not orphaned. they no longer exist.

4 April 2014

3 April 2014

7 March 2014

5 March 2014

2 March 2014

1 March 2014

  • curprev 17:3717:37, 1 March 2014meta>Flyer22 Frozenm 34,121 bytes −1 And as for your latest two edits, I was more so referring to you pipelinking "Animal pornography" (which is a redirect to the Zoophilia article) under "zoophilic imagery."
  • curprev 17:2517:25, 1 March 2014meta>Flyer22 Frozenm 34,122 bytes −1 WP:Dummy edit: Still a terrible link because of its redundancy, but you never learn. Sigh.
  • curprev 17:2417:24, 1 March 2014meta>Jarble 34,123 bytes −85 →‎Zoophilic pornography: These articles are already linked from the main article, so this hatnote should link to the main article instead.
  • curprev 17:2217:22, 1 March 2014meta>Jarble 34,208 bytes +23 Linking
  • curprev 17:2017:20, 1 March 2014meta>Flyer22 Frozen 34,185 bytes +20 And next time you add a template, you should make that clear in your edit summary.
  • curprev 17:1717:17, 1 March 2014meta>Flyer22 Frozenm 34,165 bytes −1 In other words, readers who click on the Pornography link should not be taken to a redirect that goes to an article that is already linked. If they want to visit that section, they will; it's not an article!
  • curprev 17:1517:15, 1 March 2014meta>Flyer22 Frozen 34,166 bytes −39 Undid revision 597689180 by Jarble (talk) Links should not be that long. And that article is linked. Linking to a section in it is not better than linking to the Pornography article for the definition
  • curprev 17:0817:08, 1 March 2014meta>Jarble 34,205 bytes +39 Linking

27 February 2014

23 February 2014

14 February 2014

8 February 2014

6 February 2014

5 February 2014

28 January 2014

6 January 2014

4 January 2014

3 January 2014

2 January 2014

28 December 2013

1 December 2013

21 November 2013

17 November 2013

4 November 2013

1 November 2013

21 October 2013

18 October 2013

14 October 2013

13 October 2013

4 October 2013

2 October 2013

26 September 2013

13 September 2013

1 September 2013

31 August 2013

24 August 2013

9 August 2013

29 July 2013

26 July 2013

24 July 2013

13 July 2013

10 July 2013

23 June 2013

22 June 2013

  • curprev 08:3608:36, 22 June 2013meta>Lguipontes 34,292 bytes +2,227 Zoophilia was hardly officially mentioned in any way in Brazil after the decriminalization of sodomy in 1830, so I think it is accurate to make a parallel with those who were regarded as sodomizers too, back then.

19 June 2013

15 June 2013

7 June 2013

19 May 2013

12 May 2013

30 April 2013

29 April 2013

26 April 2013

21 April 2013

20 April 2013

17 April 2013

11 April 2013

9 April 2013

6 April 2013

2 April 2013

15 March 2013

14 March 2013

4 March 2013

  • curprev 18:3418:34, 4 March 2013meta>Orangemellow 37,298 bytes −58 As of Feb 2013, bestiality is now illegal in Germany. Removed references indicating it is still legal.

28 February 2013

  • curprev 22:2222:22, 28 February 2013meta>Orangemellow 37,356 bytes −536 Updates Germany's position on bestiality. As of Feb 2013, it is now illegal.

24 February 2013

31 January 2013

13 January 2013

7 January 2013

24 December 2012

1 December 2012

29 November 2012

28 November 2012

21 November 2012

  • curprev 08:0308:03, 21 November 2012meta>Cipheron 37,053 bytes −38 removed scare quotes from: ' animal "cruelty" ' and cut the baseless claim that "no harm was done". animal cruelty is an actual legal charge. putting it in scare quotes violates NPOV as does the "no harm" claim - did a VET prove no harm was/could be done?

10 November 2012

8 November 2012

7 November 2012

13 October 2012

12 October 2012

4 October 2012

22 September 2012

16 September 2012

13 September 2012

10 September 2012

4 September 2012

3 September 2012

1 September 2012

25 August 2012

21 August 2012

20 August 2012

19 August 2012

10 August 2012

9 August 2012

8 August 2012

3 August 2012

17 July 2012

28 June 2012

18 June 2012

  • curprev 11:2011:20, 18 June 2012meta>RjwilmsiBotm 69,286 bytes +969 CiteCompletion, dates: 6, locations: 1, works/pubs: 7, authors: 6, titles: 6, using AWB (8079)

11 June 2012

10 June 2012

5 June 2012

4 June 2012

3 June 2012

  • curprev 21:5921:59, 3 June 2012meta>Hmainsm 66,958 bytes −7 copyedit, clarity edits, MOS implementation, and/or AWB general fixes using AWB (8062)

1 June 2012

31 May 2012

30 May 2012

27 May 2012

17 May 2012

15 May 2012

12 May 2012

10 May 2012

4 May 2012

3 May 2012

(newest | oldest) View (newer 500 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)