Non-Human Animal Consent

Masters, in 1962, wrote "It has always been noted in fact, by ancient historians and up through Kinsey in our own time, that animals tend to become affectionately attached (not only physically) to humans who have sex relations with them, and sometimes have even been known to forsake intercourse with their own kind in testimony to their preference for relations with humans. Whatever one may think of bestiality, this does not sound as if it were an act of cruelty so far as the animal is concerned."

And ultimately speculated that: "One seems forced to conclude, the animal derives a considerable psychical and/or emotional pleasure from sexual contact with a being of a higher nervous, emotional, and intellectual organization, who is somehow able to provide the animal with non-material rewards which another animal is not able to offer."

Similar findings are also reported by Kinsey (cited by Masters 1962), and others earlier in history. Likewise, Miletski (1999) notes that information on sex with animals on the internet is often very emphatic as to how to give pleasure and identify consent beforehand, to the point that "one can find instructions on how to tell if the animal is in the mood for sex."

Destigmatization of Bestiality

Modern researchers zoophilia, from the Masters ( . English the REL Masters ) ( 1962 ) and ending with Andrea Beatz ( 2002 ), come to the following conclusions:

Emotions, relationships and motivation should be the main aspect of studying a problem. It is important to evaluate not only sexual intercourse as such, but also the nature of the act itself (Masters, Miletsky, Beats). Emotions, feelings of zoophiles and caring for an animal can be genuine, related, authentic and, as the animal needs, mutual, and not only serve as a substitute or a sign of their expression (Masters, Miletsky, Weinberg, Beats) [24]

The Dream of the Fisherman's Wife, 1820 Japanese engraving Most zoophiles have (or have had) sexual relationships with humans, along with zoosexual ones. (Masters, Beats) [25] Currently, the society is significantly misled about the problem of bestiality and its aspects. (Masters, Miletsky, Weinberg, Beats) [26] Contrary to popular belief, in practice there is a significant popular or "latent" interest in mating and sexual behavior of animals, bestiality, both imaginary and real (Nancy Friday, Massen, Masters). Significant differences between zoophilia and zoosadism are emphasized by all of these researchers. Masters ( 1962 ), Miletsky ( 1999 ), and Weinberg ( 2003 ) note and comment on the serious social harm caused by many common prejudices about bestiality. Despite the fact that the results of modern research are consistent with the claims of supporters of destigmatization [27] of bestiality, the public remains hostile to the idea of ​​sexual relations between humans and animals.

Supporters of the revision of views on bestiality argue that the relationship between humans and animals can go beyond sexual relations, which is confirmed by research [28] , and that animals, in turn, are also capable of forming genuine intimate relationships that can last for a relatively long time. time and functionally do not differ from any other love-sexual relationship [29] .

Some researchers argue that at least some species of animals are capable of mutual sexual contact with humans [28] .

References

https://psychology.wikia.org/wiki/Zoophilia

This page discusses the topic of consent as it applies to non-human animals. For more information about the wider legal and social ramifications for consent based on sexual practices, see Sexual consent.

Notes

Disease ontology database

(English) - 2016.

Monarch Disease Ontology release 2018-06-29sonu - 2018-06-29 - 2018.

Kraft-Ebing R. Sexual psychopathy, with particular attention to perversion of sexual feelings.
 (inaccessible link since 26-05-2013 [2933 days] - history

, copy ) M .: Respublika, 1996.591 p.

So, for example, Masters (1962)

uses the term "lieth with a beast" ( "bestialist" Eng. bestialist ) in discussions of zoosadism, see "related perversion." In other cases, he prefers to use other terms.

Following Masters, Stephanie Lafarge

shares bestialism and bestiality: "it's important to make the distinction between bestialists and zoophiles, because zoophiles try not to hurt their animals, whereas bestialists do."

The American Heritage® Stedman's Medical Dictionary
see overview: Myths of the peoples of the world. In 2 volumes. M., 1991-92. Vol. 1. P.440-449
Studies of the genome of Neanderthals have shown that the hybridization of Cro-Magnons (Homo sapiens) and Neanderthals took place outside Africa in the period 50-80 thousand years ago, leaving about 1 to 4% of the Neanderthal genome in various populations of modern humans. See A Draft Sequence of the Neandertal Genome
(English) . Science (7 May 2010). Retrieved April 18, 2011. Archived
August 25, 2011.

Deryagin G.B. Criminal sexology. M. , 2008.S. 120. ISBN 978-5-93004-274-0

Deryagin G.B., Sidorov P.I., Soloviev A.G.Socio-psychological aspects of female sexual actions with animals

// Russian psychiatric journal. 1999. No. 5. S. 4-7. “And lie down with no cattle to pour out [the seed] and be defiled by it; and a woman should not stand in front of cattle to mate with it: this is disgusting. " ( Lev. 18:23 ) and “Whoever mixes with cattle, put him to death, and kill the cattle. If a woman goes to some cattle to copulate with her, then kill the woman and the cattle: let them be put to death, their blood on them. " ( Lev. 20:15 , 16 ). Article CXVI. Punishment of unnatural debauchery // Carolina: the criminal code of Charles V ... www.law-students.net. Date of treatment: October 17, 2018.

Article 997 of the Code of Criminal and Correctional Punishments of 1845.

http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/source/aquinas-homo.html Aquinas on Unnatural Sex http://www.answering-christianity.org/sex_with_animals_forbidden.htm Ample Islamic References about sex with animals being forbidden! Alexander Berzin. Explaining Buddhist Sexual Ethics: A Historical Perspective. Part Two: Historical Concepts of Inappropriate Sexual Behavior Obraztsov V.A.Criminalistic psychology.

M. , 2002. ISBN 5-238-00354-4 .

Deryagin G.B. Criminal sexology. A course of lectures for law schools. M. , 2008.S. 124. ISBN 978-5-93004-274-0 . Alvarez WA, Freinhar JP. A prevalence study of bestiality (zoophilia) in psychiatric in-patients, medical in-patients, and psychiatric staff.

(English)  // Int J Psychosom. : journal. - 1991. - Vol. 38 , no. 1-4 . - P. 45-7 .

Crépault C., Couture M. Men's erotic fantasies (English) // Archives of Sexual Behavior (English) Russian. ... - 1980. - Vol. 9 , no. 6 . - P. 565-581 . - PMID 7458662 .

From Masters (1962): “Sexual arousal at the sight of animals copulating has been reported by a great many persons, both famous and obscure, who have added that such arousal leads sometimes to acts of bestiality, sometimes to masturbation, and occasionally to heterosexual coitus with anyone available. (That the latter result may be forthcoming has always been well known to operators of houses of prostitution, who have staged exhibitions of animal coitus and of bestiality for the express purpose of stimulating the carnal appetites of their patrons ...) "

Deryagin G.B. Criminal sexology. A course of lectures for law schools. M. , 2008.S. 122. ISBN 978-5-93004-274-0 .

Posner, Richard, A Guide to America's Sex Laws, The University of Chicago Press, 1996. ISBN 0-226-67564-5 . Page 207.
Beatz (2002), Section 5.2.4, comments on the point of view of Massey ( Eng.  Massen ).
Beats (2002), section 5.2.4.
Covered by the Beats (2002) in section 5.2.7.
For example, Miletski is not a supporter of bestiality, as he says in the prologue of his book

"... a bias not about bestiality, zoophilia and the individuals involved, but rather against discrimination and hatred of people who are misunderstood."

Masters (1962):"In fact, many ancient historians and modern researchers up to Kinsey have noticed that animals tend to form a close emotional (not only physiological) bond with people who have had sexual experience with them."
Beats (2002), section 5.2.11: “New - at least in his time - was the perspective of Ullerstam (1966) who suggested, that emotions as well as erotic feelings can even be reciprocal between man and animals. Also Kinsey (1954) held the opinion, that the sexual contact can lead up to a close emotional attachment to the animal and that in some cases the animal gets used to this interspecies contact so much, that it neglects possible sex partners of its own kind . "

"Zoo documentary" X Links