Template:Cite web: Revision history

From Zoophilia Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

Diff selection: Mark the radio buttons of the revisions to compare and hit enter or the button at the bottom.
Legend: (cur) = difference with latest revision, (prev) = difference with preceding revision, m = minor edit.

(newest | oldest) View ( | older 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

8 February 2006

6 February 2006

9 January 2006

27 December 2005

8 December 2005

3 December 2005

1 December 2005

30 November 2005

28 November 2005

  • curprev 18:0518:05, 28 November 2005meta>Ligulem 1,112 bytes +9 Warning: drastic change: Replaced {{if}} with new {{qif}}. I have tested that but please revert quickly if you see anything that doesn't work. Thanks!

25 November 2005

  • curprev 00:4100:41, 25 November 2005meta>Ligulem 1,103 bytes +54 used new parameters "test" and "then" of {{if}} instead of "1=" and "2=" (this should have not changed the semantic of the code)

23 November 2005

  • curprev 21:3721:37, 23 November 2005meta>Ligulemm 1,049 bytes +2 line 18: indented closing "}}" by one level as this refers to "{{boolor" on line 15 (warning: cannot be seen in diff)
  • curprev 20:2220:22, 23 November 2005meta>AzaTothm 1,047 bytes +22 back link if required params missing
  • curprev 19:3819:38, 23 November 2005meta>AzaToth 1,025 bytes +232 ok, back with the numbers :) plus some other
  • curprev 18:1218:12, 23 November 2005meta>AzaToth 793 bytes +200 reverted to my proposal, but removed unneccissary paramaters as per consensus. parameters still on 'url' because it can often include '='
  • curprev 14:0614:06, 23 November 2005meta>Ligulem 593 bytes −228 reverted to revision as of 08:53. See talk (I would like to discuss revision 11:07 first before applying it)
  • curprev 11:0711:07, 23 November 2005meta>AzaToth 821 bytes +228 Ok, I sat the parameters right now, they should show lowercase now
  • curprev 08:5308:53, 23 November 2005meta>SEWilco 593 bytes +8 rv to last SEWilco to restore date format for user preferences. See existing Talk about dates. Read warning about understanding before changing.
  • curprev 08:4608:46, 23 November 2005meta>Brian0918m 585 bytes −8 There is no point to wiki-linking the date in a reference. Nobody is going to be checking what historic event happened the same day you accessed a file. It creates too many red links.
  • curprev 03:5203:52, 23 November 2005meta>SEWilco 593 bytes −203 rv AzaToth's changes because it displayed uppercased parameter names as defaults. Didn't examine other changes; discuss in Talk before trying something so we know what to Think about.

22 November 2005

21 November 2005

19 November 2005

15 November 2005

14 November 2005

11 November 2005

9 November 2005

15 July 2005

13 July 2005

  • curprev 22:0022:00, 13 July 2005meta>PAR 96 bytes +10 Added "Web Link" as first two words. Otherwise its not clear what kind of ref it is (books, etc are obvious)

10 July 2005

  • curprev 08:5008:50, 10 July 2005meta>Master Thief Garrettm 86 bytes 0 the period (.) is not part of the title so should be outside the quotation marks. Yes I am picky. :)

26 June 2005

30 March 2005

24 February 2005

4 February 2005

15 December 2004

7 December 2004

(newest | oldest) View ( | older 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)