Template:Paraphilias: Revision history

From Zoophilia Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

Diff selection: Mark the radio buttons of the revisions to compare and hit enter or the button at the bottom.
Legend: (cur) = difference with latest revision, (prev) = difference with preceding revision, m = minor edit.

(newest | oldest) View (newer 20 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

1 September 2020

22 August 2020

1 June 2020

  • curprev 02:4702:47, 1 June 2020wk>Flyer22 Frozen 2,429 bytes +2,429 Stick to better known. Similar goes for using "lust murder" instead of "erotophonophilia." But only concerned with one for now.

31 May 2020

7 March 2020

4 February 2020

  • curprev 05:0405:04, 4 February 2020meta>BrightVamp 2,398 bytes +21 Added erotic hypnosis - see the entry itself for a citation supporting that some people find it inherently erotic, similar to crush fetish or exhibitionism

18 October 2019

22 September 2019

  • curprev 10:3410:34, 22 September 2019meta>Þjarkur 2,394 bytes −16 Remove Dippoldism which is not presented as a paraphilia in most sources, just as a synonym for flagellation

27 August 2019

  • curprev 22:4022:40, 27 August 2019meta>Flyer22 Frozenm 2,410 bytes −1 Taken to your talk page. This is not about protecting people's feelings. It's about accuracy.
  • curprev 22:3422:34, 27 August 2019meta>Flyer22 Frozen 2,411 bytes +170 Undid revision 912787515 by *Treker (talk) They do. Read the articles.
  • curprev 21:1721:17, 27 August 2019meta>*Treker 2,241 bytes −170 Articles named do not agree with these comments. We're not here to protect people feelings.

7 August 2019

  • curprev 21:5921:59, 7 August 2019meta>Flyer22 Frozenm 2,411 bytes +5 Additional comment: But then again, in simple terms, a paraphilia is an atypical/unusual sexual interest. If enough reliable sources (and I don't mean sources at the time it was being proposed to be added to the DSM-5) call hebephilia a paraphilia, I would support its addition on this template. The sources should be WP:MEDRS-compliant.
  • curprev 21:2421:24, 7 August 2019meta>Flyer22 Frozen 2,406 bytes +117 In my previous edit summary, I meant "at least," not "at east," of course. Added different note about hebpehilia; I know people don't like all the debate that went on regarding it, since we know how vulnerable pubescents can be, but the topic has been hotly debated by researchers (as its Wikipedia article shows). I won't re-add pygophilia for now since mazophilia (breast partialism) currently isn't on the template, but researchers don't mean general interest; they mean the atypical.
  • curprev 21:0521:05, 7 August 2019meta>Flyer22 Frozen 2,289 bytes −2 Comment: And, as a reminder, ephebophilia covers attraction to mid-to-late teenagers, including those who are legal adults. The Age of consent commonly includes those ages, and the age of majority usually includes people who are at east age 18. And as far attraction to the buttocks or breasts, researchers mean specific attraction focused on those bodies parts. It is partialism.
  • curprev 20:5020:50, 7 August 2019meta>Flyer22 Frozen 2,291 bytes +66 Undid revision 909820185 by *Treker (talk) It actually is.
  • curprev 20:4920:49, 7 August 2019meta>Flyer22 Frozen 2,225 bytes −16 Per the article and debate noted there, hebephilia is not supported.
  • curprev 20:2420:24, 7 August 2019meta>*Treker 2,241 bytes +34 No edit summary
  • curprev 20:2120:21, 7 August 2019meta>*Treker 2,207 bytes +41 No edit summary
  • curprev 20:1920:19, 7 August 2019meta>*Treker 2,166 bytes +5 No edit summary
  • curprev 20:1820:18, 7 August 2019meta>*Treker 2,161 bytes −22 Listed below in "see also" section
(newest | oldest) View (newer 20 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)