Template:Quote/doc/boilerplate: Revision history

From Zoophilia Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

Diff selection: Mark the radio buttons of the revisions to compare and hit enter or the button at the bottom.
Legend: (cur) = difference with latest revision, (prev) = difference with preceding revision, m = minor edit.

3 September 2020

2 August 2020

  • curprev 07:1807:18, 2 August 2020meta>Adallacem 1,409 bytes 0 Fixed a typo, changing "provided" to "provides" because the subject is currently applicable (current tense vs past tense).

4 April 2020

5 May 2019

  • curprev 19:2119:21, 5 May 2019meta>SMcCandlish 1,330 bytes +84 This DOES NOT APPLY at that page. It
  • curprev 12:3212:32, 5 May 2019meta>Herostratus 1,246 bytes −24 Reverted to revision 895469538 by Herostratus: Mnmh, don't see this an improvement, since why shouldn't template:Quote point out the options availabe to the editor... best not to make further edits here until all this has been worked out, I think. Editor engaged on his talk page. (TW)

4 May 2019

  • curprev 20:5720:57, 4 May 2019meta>SMcCandlish 1,270 bytes 0 Let's see if I can get it right this time.
  • curprev 20:5220:52, 4 May 2019meta>SMcCandlish 1,270 bytes +4 fix syntax error; I need coffee
  • curprev 20:5220:52, 4 May 2019meta>SMcCandlish 1,266 bytes +108 when viewing this doc snippet as a template, should see all of its contents
  • curprev 20:4720:47, 4 May 2019meta>SMcCandlishm 1,158 bytes −3 wrong word
  • curprev 20:4620:46, 4 May 2019meta>SMcCandlish 1,161 bytes +31 This material also pertains in no way to the block quote template recommended by MoS, and also needs to be escaped at it.
  • curprev 20:4420:44, 4 May 2019meta>SMcCandlish 1,130 bytes −146 This line has to go, since all three things it says are now incorrect.
  • curprev 20:4420:44, 4 May 2019meta>SMcCandlish 1,276 bytes +30 This doc template is now transcluded at Template:Quote, for which this warning is incorrect; needs to only appear on the templates that are decorative pull-quote templates.
  • curprev 13:3513:35, 4 May 2019meta>Herostratus 1,246 bytes −2,667 Reverted to revision 894421375 by Herostratus: Reverted again, per WP:BRD. There's a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style#"Decorative quotations" again, get consensus there first, or run a new RfC, or something. Futher back-and-forth reverting would probably not be helpful. (TW)

29 April 2019

  • curprev 17:5417:54, 29 April 2019meta>SMcCandlish 3,913 bytes +2,667 Nah. Herostratus made undiscussed changes that directly conflict with some WP:P&Gs and with the RfC results. This accurately reflects both.

27 April 2019

  • curprev 19:5319:53, 27 April 2019meta>Herostratus 1,246 bytes −2,667 Reverted to revision 760939095 by Herostratus (talk): Liked it better before, reverted WP:BRD. Make you case on the talk page and gain consensus for these changes please (TW)

7 April 2019

19 January 2017

18 January 2017

17 January 2017

27 November 2016

4 September 2016

9 June 2016

  • curprev 21:0121:01, 9 June 2016meta>Matt Fitzpatrickm 1,491 bytes +5 strong sted b for important words in warning

10 February 2016