Template:POV check: Difference between revisions
From Zoophilia Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
meta>Tizio m new category |
m 175 revisions imported |
||
| (92 intermediate revisions by 56 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
< | {{ {{{|safesubst:}}}#invoke:Unsubst||date=__DATE__ |$B= | ||
<!--{{POV check}} begin-->{{Ambox | |||
| | | name = POV-check | ||
| [[ | | subst = <includeonly>{{subst:substcheck}}</includeonly> | ||
| ''' | | type = content | ||
| | | image = [[File:ambox_scales.svg|40px|link=]] | ||
| issue = This {{{1|article}}} '''has been nominated to be checked for its [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutrality]]'''. | |||
| fix = Discussion of this nomination can be found on the [[{{#if:{{{talk|}}}|{{TALKPAGENAME}}#{{{talk}}}|{{TALKPAGENAME}}}}|talk page]]. | |||
| date = {{{date|}}} | |||
= | | removalnotice=yes | ||
| cat = Articles needing POV-check | |||
}}<!--{{POV check}} end--> | |||
}}<noinclude> | |||
{{Documentation}} | |||
</noinclude> | </noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 13:36, 3 September 2020
 | This article has been nominated to be checked for its neutrality. |
Use this template to request that an article be checked for POV ("Point of View"). The editor who adds the tag should address the issues on the talk page, pointing to specific issues that are actionable within the content policies. If this information is not added to the talk page, then this tag may be removed by any editor.
For POV issues which are disputed, use the {{POV}} template instead. For more information, see Wikipedia:NPOV dispute ("NPOV" is an abbreviation for "Neutral Point of View").
Usage
Place {{POV check|date=November 2024}} at the top of the suspect article.
Use {{POV check|section}} to tag a specific section.
Use the |talk= parameter to specify the talkpage section where you address the issue, like this:
{{POV check|talk=talkpage section name|date=November 2024}}
When to remove
This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. You may remove this template whenever any one of the following is true:
- There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard either that the alleged problem in the article was not a violation of the NPOV policy, or that it has been resolved.
- It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given.
- In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Notes
- Articles using this template are added to Category:Articles needing POV-check, or a dated subcategory thereof.
- If you did not include a date parameter, it will be added later by a WP:BOT.
- This template is a self-reference.
- Please do not subst: this template.
Redirects
- {{POV Check}}
- {{POV check}}
- {{POV-Check}}
- {{POVCheck}}
- {{POVcheck}}
- {{Povcheck}}
- {{Pov Check}}
- {{Pov check}}
- {{Pov-Check}}
- {{Pov-check}}
- {{NPOV Check}}
- {{NPOV check}}
See also
Wikipedia project pages
- Wikipedia:Accuracy dispute
- Wikipedia:Consensus
- Wikipedia:Dispute resolution
- Wikipedia:Disputed statement
- Wikipedia:Neutral point of view
- Wikipedia:Template messages
- Wikipedia:Template namespace
Templates
Disputed factual accuracy
- Boxes:
- {{Disputed}} Article, {{Dispute about|what}}, {{Disputed section}} Section
- {{Disputed tag}} For disputing recent promotions or amendments of policies and guidelines
- {{Under discussion}} For use on project pages (e.g., policies and guidelines), not on articles
- Inline:
- {{Dubious}} and {{Disputed inline}} Statement
- {{Under discussion inline}} Statements on project pages
Both accuracy and POV
- Boxes:
- {{Controversial}} Talk page
Disputed neutrality (POV)
- Boxes:
- {{POV}} Article, {{POV section}} Section, {{POV lead}} Lead section
- {{POV map}} Map, {{POV title}} Title
- {{POV check}} Article, {{POV check|section}} Section
- {{Systemic bias}} Article
- Inline:
- {{Lopsided}} Statement
- {{POV statement}} Statement
- {{POV check inline}} Statement
