Template:Facepalm: Difference between revisions
From Zoophilia Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
meta>Scott MacDonald rv ok, that was the intention. But the point is to tell the user how it ought to be used now, not to inform them of the creator's intention |
meta>Tarc Um, anyone undedrstand what the meme is, where it came from, and how it is used in internet culture? No one facepalms themselves, it is used in response to others. Keep the "denigration is unacceptable" bit, but thie revisionism is silly. |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{#switch: {{lc:{{{1}}}}} | supreme | sfod=[[File:Facepalm3.svg|{{{size|20px}}}]] '''Supreme [[facepalm]] of destiny''' | #default=[[File:Facepalm3.svg|{{{size|15px}}}]] '''{{{1|[[Facepalm]]}}}'''}}<noinclude> | {{#switch: {{lc:{{{1}}}}} | supreme | sfod=[[File:Facepalm3.svg|{{{size|20px}}}]] '''Supreme [[facepalm]] of destiny''' | #default=[[File:Facepalm3.svg|{{{size|15px}}}]] '''{{{1|[[Facepalm]]}}}'''}}<noinclude> | ||
{{Documentation|content= | {{Documentation|content= | ||
This template | This template is intended to be used by editors as an "expression of embarrassment, frustration, disbelief, disgust, shame or general woe" (see [[Facepalm]]) i.e. as a light-hearted self-mockery, amusement at an unlikely lapse, or humorous disbelief at perceived idiocy, forgetfulness or mistake on another editor's part. | ||
Its use as an expression of abuse, mockery, or for the denigration of others is unacceptable. If there is doubt that a recipient would take it in good humor, ''you should not use it''. | Its use as an expression of abuse, mockery, or for the denigration of others is unacceptable. If there is doubt that a recipient would take it in good humor, ''you should not use it''. | ||
Revision as of 21:17, 29 October 2011
Template documentationThis template is intended to be used by editors as an "expression of embarrassment, frustration, disbelief, disgust, shame or general woe" (see Facepalm) i.e. as a light-hearted self-mockery, amusement at an unlikely lapse, or humorous disbelief at perceived idiocy, forgetfulness or mistake on another editor's part.
Its use as an expression of abuse, mockery, or for the denigration of others is unacceptable. If there is doubt that a recipient would take it in good humor, you should not use it.
- See also: {{trout}}
Usage
