Template:Facepalm: Difference between revisions
From Zoophilia Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
meta>Σ Rewording |
meta>Tarc "had ought" ? What is this, Dickens? Replace with a simple "can be". Let's stop with the overreaching attempts to clarify what is already blindingly obvious; "feel free to use this template, but don't be a dick in doing so" |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{#switch: {{lc:{{{1}}}}} | supreme | sfod=[[File:Facepalm3.svg|{{{size|20px}}}]] '''Supreme [[facepalm]] of destiny''' | #default=[[File:Facepalm3.svg|{{{size|15px}}}]] '''{{{1|[[Facepalm]]}}}'''}}<noinclude> | {{#switch: {{lc:{{{1}}}}} | supreme | sfod=[[File:Facepalm3.svg|{{{size|20px}}}]] '''Supreme [[facepalm]] of destiny''' | #default=[[File:Facepalm3.svg|{{{size|15px}}}]] '''{{{1|[[Facepalm]]}}}'''}}<noinclude> | ||
{{Documentation|content= | {{Documentation|content= | ||
This template | This template can be be used by editors as an "expression of embarrassment, frustration, disbelief, disgust, shame or general woe" (see [[Facepalm]]) i.e. as a light-hearted mockery, amusement at an unlikely lapse, or humorous disbelief at perceived idiocy, forgetfulness or mistake on another editor's part. However, doing so in reference to the mistakes of others, is liable to be regarded as a violation of [[WP:CIVIL|civility]]. | ||
Its use as an expression of abuse, mockery, or for the denigration of others is unacceptable. If there is doubt that a recipient would take it in good humor, ''you should not use it''. | Its use as an expression of abuse, mockery, or for the denigration of others is unacceptable. If there is doubt that a recipient would take it in good humor, ''you should not use it''. | ||
Revision as of 02:56, 30 October 2011
Template documentationThis template can be be used by editors as an "expression of embarrassment, frustration, disbelief, disgust, shame or general woe" (see Facepalm) i.e. as a light-hearted mockery, amusement at an unlikely lapse, or humorous disbelief at perceived idiocy, forgetfulness or mistake on another editor's part. However, doing so in reference to the mistakes of others, is liable to be regarded as a violation of civility.
Its use as an expression of abuse, mockery, or for the denigration of others is unacceptable. If there is doubt that a recipient would take it in good humor, you should not use it.
- See also: {{trout}}
Usage
