Template:Wikipedia essays: Difference between revisions
From Zoophilia Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
meta>Nick Levinson (Restored the position of the Cherrypicking essay (it's not an essay on notability, but on an issue in using sources, thus about editing, or essay construction).) |
meta>CFCF No edit summary |
||
Line 105: | Line 105: | ||
* [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not being written in an organized fashion|Wikipedia is not being written in an organized fashion]] | * [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not being written in an organized fashion|Wikipedia is not being written in an organized fashion]] | ||
* [[Wikipedia:The world will not end tomorrow|The world will not end tomorrow]] | * [[Wikipedia:The world will not end tomorrow|The world will not end tomorrow]] | ||
* [[Wikipedia:Verbage|Verbage = Word garbage | |||
* [[Wikipedia:Write the article first|Write the article first]] | * [[Wikipedia:Write the article first|Write the article first]] | ||
* [[Wikipedia:Writing better articles|Writing better articles]] | * [[Wikipedia:Writing better articles|Writing better articles]] |
Revision as of 21:12, 27 February 2016
{{Navbox with collapsible groups |name = Wikipedia essays |title = Essays about Wikipedia |selected = |listclass = hlist |state = expanded
| group1 = Essays on building, editing, and deleting content |abbr1=building |state1 = |list1= {{Navbox|child |group1= Philosophy |list1=
- Articles must be written
- Avoid vague introductions
- Be a reliable source
- Cohesion
- Concede lost arguments
- 8 simple rules for editing our encyclopedia
- Don't lie
- Explanationism
- External criticism of Wikipedia
- Here to build an encyclopedia
- Most ideas are bad
- Not editing because of Wikipedia restriction
- Neutrality of Sources
- Oversimplification
- Paradoxes
- Paraphrasing
- POV and OR from editors, sources, and fields
- Product, process, policy
- Purpose
- Ten Simple Rules for Editing Wikipedia
- Tendentious editing
- The role of policies in collaborative anarchy
- The rules are principles
- Trifecta
- Wikipedia in brief
- Wikipedia is an encyclopedia
- Wikipedia is a community
|group2=Construction |list2=
- 100K featured articles
- A navbox on every page
- Acronym Overkill
- Adding images improves the encyclopedia
- Advanced article editing
- Advanced table formatting
- Advanced template coding
- Advanced text formatting
- Alternatives to the "Expand" template
- Amnesia test
- An unfinished house is a real problem
- Articles have a half-life
- Autosizing images
- Avoid mission statements
- Bare URLs
- Be neutral in form
- Beef up that first revision
- Blind men and an elephant
- Cherrypicking
- Children's lit, adult new readers, & large-print books
- Citation overkill
- Concept cloud
- Creating controversial content
- Dictionaries as sources
- Don't demolish the house while it's still being built
- Don't hope the house will build itself
- Don't panic
- Editing on mobile devices
- Editors are not mindreaders
- Endorsements (commercial)
- Featured articles may have problems
- Fruit of the poisonous tree
- Give an article a chance
- Ignore STRONGNAT for date formats
- Inaccuracy
- Law sources
- Link rot
- Mine a source
- Merge Test
- Minors and persons judged incompetent
- "Murder of" articles
- Not every story/event/disaster needs a biography
- Not everything needs a navbox
- Nothing is in stone
- Permastub
- Potential, not just current state
- Printability
- Pruning article revisions
- Publicists
- Put a little effort into it
- Restoring part of a reverted edit
- Robotic editing
- Sham consensus
- Run an edit-a-thon
- Temporary versions of articles
- There is a deadline
- There is no deadline
- The deadline is now
- Walled garden
- What an article should not include
- Wikipedia is a work in progress
- Wikipedia is not being written in an organized fashion
- The world will not end tomorrow
- [[Wikipedia:Verbage|Verbage = Word garbage
- Write the article first
- Writing better articles
|group3=Deletion |list3=
- Adjectives in your recommendations
- AfD is not a war zone
- Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions
- Arguments to avoid in deletion reviews
- Arguments to avoid in image deletion discussions
- Arguments to make in deletion discussions
- Avoid repeated arguments
- Before commenting in a deletion discussion
- But there must be sources!
- Content removal
- Delete the junk
- Does deletion help
- Don't overuse shortcuts to policy and guidelines to win your argument
- Follow the leader
- How to save an article proposed for deletion
- I just don't like it
- Immunity
- Liar Liar Pants on Fire
- Nothing
- Overzealous deletion
- Relisting can be abusive
- Wikipedia is not Whack-A-Mole
- Why was the page I created deleted?
- What to do if your article gets tagged for speedy deletion
- When in doubt, hide it in the woodwork
}}
| group2 = Essays on civility |abbr2=civility |state2 =
|list2=
| group3 = Essays on notability |abbr3=notability |state3 =
|list3=| group4 = Humorous essays |abbr4=humour |state4 =
|list4=| group5 =About essays |abbr5=about |state5 =
|list5=About essays | |
---|---|
Related subjects |
|below =Essay directory }}