Template:Xt/see also: Difference between revisions
From Zoophilia Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
meta>SMcCandlish consistent markup, and identify main use for an important one |
meta>SMcCandlish m SMcCandlish moved page Template:Xt see also to Template:Xt/see also without leaving a redirect: doc chunks like this should really be sub-pages |
(No difference)
| |
Revision as of 20:30, 26 December 2017
{{xt}}inline positive example text, in green, with serif font{{bxt}}same as{{xt}}but uses bold instead of serif font{{mxt}}same as{{xt}}but uses mono-spaced font (especially useful in source code){{xt2}}same as{{xt}}but for blocks of text{{!xt}}inline negative example text, in red, with serif font{{!bxt}}same as{{!xt}}but uses boldface{{!mxt}}same as{{!xt}}but uses mono-spaced font; used for incorrect/deprecated code examples – try<code>{{!mxt|1=<nowiki>...</nowiki>}}</code>{{!xt2}}same as{{!xt}}but for blocks{{xtd}}inline deprecated (or uncertain, unavailable, lorem, etc.) example text, in grey{{bxtd}}same as{{xtd}}but uses boldface{{mxtd}}same as{{xtd}}but uses mono-spaced font{{xtn}}inline neutral example text, with no color change, when none of the above applies{{bxtn}}same as{{xtn}}but uses boldface; it still applies a CSS class, so it's not simply boldfacing{{mxtn}}same as{{xtn}}but uses mono-spaced font; this is a good template to use when the shaded box formatting of<code>...</code>might be undesirable, or the semantics of it incorrect in the context{{dc}}inlinedeprecated or deleted material; {{dc2}} variant hasstrikethrough(both explicitly use the<del>element); can be used in mainspace (articles), and where necessary wrapped in<code>,<samp>, or<kbd>
