Trial of Thomas Hogg

From Zoophilia wiki
Revision as of 10:21, 1 April 2026 by imported>Bloit (Removed redirect to Template:Nobeidore.raw)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
IMPORTED FROM WIKIPEDIA
This article was originally imported from Wikipedia and as such may be partially or completely broken, filled with links to non-existent pages, contain/cite outdated information, and/or exhibit a tonal incongruence relative to our original content. We at the Zoophilia Wiki make every effort to ensure up-to-date information is provided here so that zoophiles may be well-informed, and will continue to edit the article until it is readable and useful to our audience. As the page begins to materially differ from the source document, this notice will eventually be removed.
The Zoophilia Wiki disclaims any liability for misinformation spread by the archiving of these articles.
New Haven v. Thomas Hogg
CourtNew Haven Colony Court
Decided1647
Case history
Related action(s)Trial of George Spencer
Keywords

The trial of Thomas Hogg took place in New Haven Colony in 1647. Hogg was accused of bestiality when a neighbourhood sow gave birth to piglets that allegedly resembled him. Unlike several men and boys convicted of the crime and consequently hanged in the 1640s and ensuing decades, Hogg refused to confess, thus avoiding the death penalty. Called "the most interesting buggery case" ever, it left an enduring mark in the history of capital punishment.

Background

[edit | edit source]

Thomas Hogg was a servant from New Haven Colony, where the one-eyed George Spencer confessed to sodomy after a sow gave birth to a deformed one-eyed piglet, which led to his execution in early April 1642.[1] Like Spencer, Hogg did not enjoy a good reputation. He was considered a liar and a thief, and his appearance offended his neighbours.[2] Women of various social positions, including a "neager" slavewoman named Lucretia, reported his indecency, as he allowed his "filthy nakedness" (penis and scrotum) to show through his breeches. Hogg, who suffered from a painful inguinal hernia, argued that his indecency was not intentional.[3]

Charges and trial

[edit | edit source]

Five years after Spencer's execution, Hogg was implicated in "the most interesting buggery case" ever.[4] He was already awaiting trial for theft, dishonesty and indecent exposure when he was brought up on charges of bestiality,[5] after a sow gave birth to two piglets that resembled him.[1] Hogg's mistress, Mrs. Lamberton, found the birth to be a sign from God, and told the authorities that one of the "monsters" had "a fair and white skinned and head, as Thomas Hogg is",[3][4] and the other "a head like a child's and one eye like him, the bigger on the right side, as if God would describe the party, with the description of the instrument of bestyalie."[3]

Theophilus Eaton, governor of the colony, and his deputy brought Hogg to a barnyard where the crime was supposed to have taken place. They ordered him to scratch the sow under her ear,[3] after which "there appeared a working of lust in the sow, insomuch that she powred out seede before them."[1] Hogg was then ordered to scratch another sow, but she was not stimulated.[1][3][6][7] The governor and deputy governor were frustrated that, despite their experiment, Hogg denied the charges. Without the confession, the "impudent liar" could not be hanged[3] because the requirement of two witnesses could not be met.[2][5] Instead, he was convicted of lying and stealing,[5] for which he was severely whipped and incarcerated.[1][3] While imprisoned, Hogg was kept on a "mean diet and hard labor, that his lusts not be fed."[3]

Aftermath

[edit | edit source]

The situation left a permanent mark on capital punishment jurisprudence.[3] Hogg appears again in court records in 1648, when he was admonished for failing to appear for guard duty.[1][5]

References

[edit | edit source]
  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2477: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  2. 2.0 2.1 Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2477: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2477: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  4. 4.0 4.1 Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2477: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2477: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  6. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2477: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  7. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2477: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
[edit | edit source]