Quantum Pre-Implementation: Difference between revisions

From Zoophilia Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 169: Line 169:
{{div col|colwidth=25em}}
{{div col|colwidth=25em}}
<categorytree depth="1">[[:Category:People|Groups & People]]</categorytree>
<categorytree depth="1">[[:Category:People|Groups & People]]</categorytree>
 
[[:Category:People|Groups & People]]
{{div col end}}
[[:Category:Websites|Adult Toys]]
[[:Category:Websites|Websites]]
[[:Category:History|History]]
[[:Category:Surveys|Surveys]]
[[:Category:Books|Books]]
[[:Category:Research|Research]]
[[:Category:Resources|Resources]]
[[:Category:Culture|Culture]]
[[:Category:Terms|Terms]]{{div col end}}
{{Box-footer}}
{{Box-footer}}
   </div>
   </div>
   {{Robelbox/close}}
   {{Robelbox/close}}

Revision as of 07:06, 1 December 2023

Pre Implementation

ZETA logo
ZETA


Introduction
 Welcome visitor! zoophilia.wiki is an English-language, community-driven wiki to educate people about zoophiles, a minority of people with some form of sexual and/or romantic attraction to non-human animals. 

Do you know the term for Z.E.T.A?

The Principles of Z.E.T.A. Zoosexuals for the Ethical Treatment of Animals

1. Bestow upon animals the same kindness one would wish bestowed upon oneself.

2. Consider the well being of an animal companion as important as ones own.

3. Place the animals will and well being ahead of ones desires for sexual gratification.

4. Teach those who seek knowledge about bestiality and zoophilia without promoting it.

5. Discourage the practice of bestiality in the presence of fetish seekers.

6. Censure sexual exploitation of animals for the purpose of financial gain.

7. Censure those who practice and promote animal sexual abuse.

Selected Article

Selected article

Consent is a very important concept in all the Modern Sexuality Movements. It is argued by many Anti-Zoos that Animals can not consent, and therefore Zoophillia is immoral. It is also argued by some Zoos that whether animals can consent is a red-herring argument, for so long as you respect the animal, and only mate during heat, this breaks no moral law. However, the idea among among most Zoos is that animals can and do consent to sex, and have very obvious means to withdraw their consent at any time.

This page discusses the topic of consent as it applies to non-human animals. For more information about the wider legal and social ramifications for consent based on sexual practices, see Sexual consent. (Full article...)
List of selected articles

Selected Lists


Featured Content

Did You Know?..

Did you know…
Template:Did You Know?1
Question mark
Question mark
  • ...that Zoosexuality is a value-neutral term covering the spectrum of human-animal sexuality, and implies nothing more than a person with an orientation towards animals. This is a loving and non-violent, incidental intermittent or long-term, actual or wished-for, fantasy or reality. Also, similarly to other orientations such as homosexuality and heterosexuality, it may be "exclusive" in nature, or one of a range of sexual focuses - the person may have human partners as well, and their relationships may be authentically relational or otherwise.

Current Events

Browser dependent
Some browsers will not see rounded corners. Rather the corners will appear square.


Topics


Categories
Select [►] to view subcategories