Psychology of Zoosexuality: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
http://beastiality.club/beastiality-club-extreme-animal-sex-content/the-encyclopedia-of-zoophilia/ | http://beastiality.club/beastiality-club-extreme-animal-sex-content/the-encyclopedia-of-zoophilia/ | ||
{{Home}} | |||
[[Category:Research]] | [[Category:Research]] | ||
[[Category:Resources]] | [[Category:Resources]] |
Latest revision as of 00:51, 2 December 2023
This article is a stub. You can help Zoophilia.wiki by expanding it. |
Psychology of Zoosexuality
Part of the reason that many people have a strong reaction against the idea of sexual intimacy with animals may be due to the fact that most other attractions: whether that of the average person, foot-fetishist, latex-lover, or even indeed the transvestite is seeking arousal either through a human partner or something symbolic of a part of their body or at least the clothing which adorns it!
Zoosexuality is therefore different because it is concerned with a different primary target of affection: rather than a human and that which adorns them, it is another species of creature which is fawned over.
Technically a zoosexual individual may have a fetish for paws (obviously an analogue to the foot-fetish) and a zoo could also be turned on by the animals collar or other accessories in a form of homeovestism or transvestic fetishism, depending on whether the animal is wearing apparel which are socially deemed suitable for their gender or whether they are wearing tack typically used for the opposite gender, respectively.
References
http://beastiality.club/beastiality-club-extreme-animal-sex-content/the-encyclopedia-of-zoophilia/